Cited by 287Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Online social support as a buffer against online and offline peer and sexual victimization among U.S. LGBT and non-LGBT youth

Open access
Ybarra, Michele L., Mitchell, Kimberly J., Palmer, Neal A., Reisner, Sari L.·2015·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

In today's technology-infused world, we need to better understand relationships youth form with friends online, how they compare to relationships formed in-person, and whether these online relationships confer protective benefits. This is particularly important from the perspective of peer victimization, given that social support in-person appears to reduce the odds of victimization in-person. To address this literature gap, data from a sample of 5,542 U.S. adolescents, collected online between August 2010 and January 2011, were analyzed. The main variables of interest were: online and in-person peer victimization (including generalized and bullying forms) and online and in-person sexual victimization (including generalized and sexual harassment forms). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth were more likely than non-LGBT youth to have online friends and to appraise these friends as better than their in-person friends at providing emotional support. Peer victimization and unwanted sexual experiences were more commonly reported by LGBT than non-LGBT youth. Perceived quality of social support, either online or in-person, did little to attenuate the relative odds of victimization for LGBT youth. For all youth, in-person social support was associated with reduced odds of bully victimization (online and in-person) and sexual harassment (in-person), but was unrelated to the other outcomes of interest. Online social support did not reduce the odds of any type of victimization assessed. Together, these findings suggest that online friends can be an important source of social support, particularly for LGBT youth. Nonetheless, in-person social support appears to be more protective against victimization, suggesting that one is not a replacement for the other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.006

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online communities can provide TGD individuals with access to social support and connection with peers, reducing social isolation.

    “Conversely, online communities can provide TGD individuals with access to social support and connection with their peers that they might not otherwise have, reducing social isolation [27,28].”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction says online relationships may be important for LGBT youth who lack in-person support, and the Results report that gender-minority youth had more online friends than cisgender youth (page numbers unavailable). The Conclusion describes online friends as a key source of support for some LGBT youth aged 13–18, but the paper does not establish that online communities reduce social isolation among TGD individuals generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Online TGD spaces can facilitate a sense of community for TGD individuals who might otherwise be isolated from the wider TGD community.

    “Online TGD spaces can facilitate a sense of community for TGD individuals who might otherwise be isolated from the wider TGD community”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction says online connections to similar others may be especially important for LGBT youth who face in-person marginalization. The Results report that gender-minority youth had more online friends than cisgender youth. The paper does not establish that these were TGD-specific spaces or that the friendships connected isolated youth to a wider TGD community; its findings also concern youth rather than TGD individuals generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For TGD individuals, social support is a vitally important source of resilience and a protective factor against the effects of victimization.

    “For TGD individuals, social support is a vitally important source of resilience and a protective factor against the effects of victimization [12,25,28].”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction describes online support as potentially important for LGBT youth, and the Results report that in-person peer support was associated with lower odds of bullying and in-person sexual harassment. But the Results also say support did little to attenuate LGBT youths’ elevated odds of victimization. The paper does not establish protection against the effects of victimization specifically for transgender and gender-diverse individuals; it measures associations with victimization risk, not its aftermath. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many TGD individuals rely on online friendships and communities as their primary form of social support.

    “Many TGD individuals rely on online friendships and communities as their primary form of social support [12,28].”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) says a sizeable portion of youth, particularly LGBT youth, describe online friends as a key source of support. But it does not say online support is the primary form of support for many transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals. The Results (page unavailable) found no gender-identity difference in ratings of online versus in-person friends’ support. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social support is vital for coping with victimization, and the importance of social support as a protective factor for TGD individuals is consistent with previous research.

    “The importance of social support as a protective factor for TGD individuals is consistent with previous research that social support is vital for coping with victimization [28].”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that in-person peer support was associated with reduced odds of some forms of victimization, supporting a limited protective role. But the Results and Discussion say peer support did little to attenuate victimization odds for LGBT youth overall, and online support did not reduce risk; the paper does not establish that support is vital for coping with victimization among TGD individuals. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Palmer, N. A., & Reisner, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Center for Innovative Public Health Research (US)
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ybarra, Michele L.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
39
Pages
123-136
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111500167
Cited by
287
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
18.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057191)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
online social support, peer victimization, sexual victimization, sexual harassment, bullying, LGBTQ youth, adolescents, online friends, emotional support, protective factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Bisexuality, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Offenses, Social Support, Transsexualism, United States, Logistic Models, Sexual Harassment, Crime Victims, Internet, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review