Cited by 6Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Impact of cannabis on non-medical opioid use and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder: a nationwide longitudinal VA study

De Aquino, Joao P., Sofuoglu, Mehmet, Stefanovics, Elina A., Rosenheck, Robert A.·2020·The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Abstract

Background Multiple states have authorized cannabis as an opioid substitution agent and as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Objectives This study sought to investigate the relationship between cannabis use, non-medical opioid use, and PTSD symptoms among U.S. veterans.Methods From 1992–2011, veterans admitted to specialized intensive PTSD treatment participated in a national evaluation with assessments at intake and four months after discharge. Participants with non-medical opioid use ≥ 7 days during the 30 days preceding admission were divided into two groups: those with cannabis use ≥ 7 days, and those without cannabis use. These two groups were compared on measures of substance use and PTSD symptoms at baseline and 4-months outpatient follow-up. We hypothesized that, at both assessments, the group with baseline cannabis use would show less non-medical opioid use and less severe PTSD symptoms.Results Of 1,413 veterans with current non-medical opioid use, 438 (30.3%) also used cannabis, and 985 (69.7%) did not. At baseline, veterans with concurrent non-medical opioid and cannabis use had slightly fewer days of non-medical opioid use (p < .005; d = −0.16), greater use of other substances (p < .0001) and more PTSD symptoms (p = .003; d = 0.16), compared to veterans who used non-medical opioids but not cannabis. At follow-up, substance use or PTSD symptoms did not significantly differ.Conclusion Cannabis use was not associated with a substantial reduction of non-medical opioid use, or either improvement or worsening of PTSD symptoms in this population. Hence, these data do not encourage cannabis use to treat either non-medical opioid use or PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00952990.2020.1818248

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Aquino, J. P., Sofuoglu, M., Stefanovics, E. A., & Rosenheck, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Published
2020-10-09
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
812-822
ISSN
  • 0095-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-9891
OpenAlex
W3092526131
Cited by
6
References
77
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
New England Mental Illness Research and Education Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
cannabis use, nonmedical opioid use, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, opioid substitution therapy, substance use, PTSD treatment, polydrug use
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Veterans, Medical Marijuana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review