Cited by 479Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaMigration, Health and Trauma

Posttraumatic stress disorder among substance users from the general population

Linda Bauer Cottler, Wilson M. Compton, DOUGLAS E. MAGER, Edward L. Spitznagel, Aleksandar Janča·1992·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among substance users in the general population. Method The St. Louis Epidemiologic Catchment Area study, a survey of psychiatric illness in the general population, collected data on PTSD and substance use with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Among the 2,663 respondents, 430 reported a traumatic event that could qualify for PTSD; however, the rate of PTSD was low, 1.35% overall. To evaluate the relationship between PTSD and substance use, respondents were hierarchically classified into one of four substance use categories ranging from polydrug use to alcohol use only. Substance users from each category as well as substance users in general were compared with persons who did not meet the substance use threshold (comparison subjects). Results Findings indicate that cocaine/opiate users are over three times as likely as comparison subjects to report a traumatic event, report more symptoms and events, and are more likely to meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD. Physical attack, but not combat-related events, was the most prevalent event reported among cocaine/opiate users. Onset of substance use preceded onset of posttraumatic symptoms, suggesting that substance use predisposes the individual to exposure to traumatic events. When other variables--including antisocial behavior--were controlled, female gender and use of cocaine/opiates predicted PTSD. Conclusions These analyses…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.149.5.664

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cottler, L. B., Compton, W. M., MAGER, D. E., Spitznagel, E. L., & Janča, A.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1992-05-01
Volume
149
Issue
5
Pages
664-670
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W94898649
Cited by
479
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA06163, R18DA006163, DA-05619, DA05585)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use, cocaine use, opiate use, traumatic events, physical assault, prevalence, antisocial behavior, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Catchment Area, Health, Cocaine, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Missouri, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prevalence, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review