Cited by 12Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsInnovations in Medical EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Beyond thinking fast and slow: Implications of a transtheoretical model of clinical reasoning and error on teaching, assessment, and research

Parsons, Andrew S., Wijesekera, Thilan P., Olson, Andrew P. J., Torre, Dario, Durning, Steven J., Daniel, Michelle·2025·Medical Teacher

Abstract

From dual process to a family of theories known collectively as situativity, both micro and macro theories of cognition inform our current understanding of clinical reasoning (CR) and error. CR is a complex process that occurs in a complex environment, and a nuanced, expansive, integrated model of these theories is necessary to fully understand how CR is performed in the present day and in the future. In this perspective, we present these individual theories along with figures and descriptive cases for purposes of comparison before exploring the implications of a transtheoretical model of these theories for teaching, assessment, and research in CR and error.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2359963

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comprehensive models of cognition, such as the transtheoretical model, incorporate external factors, including interactions with team members or databases, which could be implemented for LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation.

    “Comprehensive models of cognition, such as the transtheoretical model31 incorporate external factors, including interactions with team members or databases, which could be implemented for LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation31.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parsons, A. S., Wijesekera, T. P., Olson, A. P. J., Torre, D., Durning, S. J., & Daniel, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Parsons, Andrew S.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2024-06-05
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
665-676
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W4399357279
Cited by
12
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
clinical reasoning, medical errors, dual-process theory, fast and slow thinking, transtheoretical model, medical education, clinical reasoning assessment, complex cognition
MeSH terms
Clinical Reasoning, Clinical Competence, Cognition, Education, Medical, Humans, Models, Psychological, Models, Theoretical, Teaching, Thinking, Models, Educational, Medical Errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review