Cited by 25Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Clinical characteristic analysis of 32 patients with abdominal incision endometriosis

Zhu, Z., Al-Beiti, M. A. M., Tang, L., Liu, X., Lu, X.·2008·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

Medical records of 32 women with abdominal incision endometriosis who underwent surgical treatment in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital at Fudan University between September 1999 and March 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. All cases concerning the diagnosis of endometriosis were confirmed by two gynaecological pathologists. The median age was 32 years (range from 25 to 45). A total of 31 patients had a history of caesarean section, and one case underwent ovarian endometrioid cystectomy. All abdominal incision endometriosis presented with a mass in the abdominal scar. Among them, there were 30 patients who complained of cyclical pain during menses. All of the 32 cases underwent surgical treatment and had follow-up from 10 months to 6 years; there was no recurrence of endometriosis in 31 cases. Abdominal incision endometriosis is rare in women and most cases present following caesarean section. It is suggested that during caesarean section, precautions need to be taken to avoid transplantation of endometrium into the abdominal incision. Surgical treatment is recommended to excise the lesion completely. The frozen section is performed during the operation due to the possibility of malignancy in abdomen incision endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443610802463744

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in the frequency of endometrioma has been reported in proportion to the increasing number of cesarean sections in recent years.

    “An increase in the frequency of endometrioma has been reported in proportion to the increasing number of CS in recent years.7”

    From Scar endometriosis: A series of 3 cases (2016) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Z., Al-Beiti, M. A. M., Tang, L., Liu, X., & Lu, X.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, X.
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
742-745
ISSN
  • 0144-3615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6893
OpenAlex
W2106096725
Cited by
25
References
19
Citations by year
2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Keywords
endometriosis, cesarean section, surgical excision, frozen section, endometriosis recurrence, endometrial transplantation
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Cesarean Section, Cicatrix, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review