Cited by 143Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsSports and Physical Education Research

The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance

Clark, Shannon E., Ste-Marie, Diane M.·2007·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

We compared two self-as-a-model interventions: self-modelling (viewing oneself perform an adaptive behaviour) and self-observation (viewing oneself perform at current skill level). Operating within Zimmerman's (1989 Zimmerman, B. J. 1989. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 329–339. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2000 Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective”. In Handbook of self-regulation, Edited by: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M. 13–39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) theory of self-regulated learning, we examined the effect of the modelling interventions on three self-regulatory processes (self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and self-satisfaction), as well as physical performance. Thirty-three children were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups. The two self-as-a model groups received the modelling intervention just before physical practice, whereas the control group received physical practice only. Analyses of the retention scores revealed significant differences for all dependent measures. Post hoc testing showed consistently that the self-modelling group performed better than the self-observation and control groups, and that the two latter groups performing similarly. These results provide support for the implementation of self-modelling interventions with children when teaching motor skills.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640410600947090

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, S. E., & Ste-Marie, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2007-03
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
577-586
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W1971116502
Cited by
143
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
self-modeling, self-observation, student self-regulation, self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, self-satisfaction, swimming performance, motor skill learning, children, social cognitive theory, retention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Analysis of Variance, Child, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Models, Theoretical, Physical Education and Training, Social Control, Informal, Swimming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review