Cited by 74Sports Dynamics and BiomechanicsSports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training Studies

Assessment of three-dimensional joint kinematics of the upper limb during simulated swimming using wearable inertial-magnetic measurement units

Fantozzi, Silvia, Giovanardi, Andrea, Magalhães, Fabrício Anício, Di Michele, Rocco, Cortesi, Matteo, Gatta, Giorgio·2016·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

The analysis of the joint kinematics during swimming plays a fundamental role both in sports conditioning and in clinical contexts. Contrary to the traditional video analysis, wearable inertial-magnetic measurements units (IMMUs) allow to analyse both the underwater and aerial phases of the swimming stroke over the whole length of the swimming pool. Furthermore, the rapid calibration and short data processing required by IMMUs provide coaches and athletes with an immediate feedback on swimming kinematics during training. This study aimed to develop a protocol to assess the three-dimensional kinematics of the upper limbs during swimming using IMMUs. Kinematics were evaluated during simulated dry-land swimming trials performed in the laboratory by eight swimmers. A stereo-photogrammetric system was used as the gold standard. The results showed high coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) values, with median (first-third quartile) of 0.97 (0.93-0.95) and 0.99 (0.97-0.99) for simulated front-crawl and breaststroke, respectively. Furthermore, the joint angles were estimated with an accuracy increasing from distal to proximal joints, with wrist indices showing median CMC values always higher than 0.90. The present findings represent an important step towards the practical use of technology based on IMMUs for the kinematic analysis of swimming in applied contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2015.1088659

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fantozzi, S., Giovanardi, A., Magalhães, F. A., Di Michele, R., Cortesi, M., & Gatta, G.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Fantozzi, Silvia
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2015-09-14
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
1073-1080
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2207598598
Cited by
74
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
swimming kinematics, wearable sensors, freestyle swimming, breaststroke, stereophotogrammetry
MeSH terms
Kinanthropometry, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Joints, Male, Models, Anatomic, Swimming, Range of Motion, Articular, Upper Extremity, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review