Cited by 88Nutrition and Health in AgingPhysical Activity and HealthSports Performance and Training

The effects of resistance training volume on osteosarcopenic obesity in older women

Cunha, Paolo M., Ribeiro, Alex S., Tomeleri, Crisieli M., Schoenfeld, Brad J., Silva, Analiza M., Souza, Mariana F., Nascimento, Matheus A., Sardinha, Luís B. +1 more·2018·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of resistance training (RT) performed with 1 or 3 sets per exercise on osteosarcopenic obesity (OSO) syndrome parameters in older women. Sixty-two older women (68.0 ± 4.3 years, 26.8 ± 4.4 kg/m2) participated in a 12-week RT program. Participants were randomly assigned into one of the three groups: two training groups that performed either 1 set (G1S, n = 21) or 3 sets (G3S, n = 20) 3 times weekly, or a control group (CG, n = 21). Body composition was assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry, strength was evaluated by 1 repetition maximum testing. The G3S presented significantly higher strength changes than G1S. The changes for percentage of body fat were higher for G3S compared to G1S. There was no difference in skeletal muscle mass between G3S and G1S, however both training groups displayed greater increases in this outcome compared to CG. There was no effect for bone mineral density. The overall analysis indicated higher (P < 0.05) positive changes for G3S than G1S (composed Z-score: G3S = 0.62 ± 0.40; G1S = 0.11 ± 0.48). The results suggest that a 12-week RT period is effective to improve the risk factors of OSO, and that 3 sets induce higher improvements than a single set.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2017.1403413

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cunha, P. M., Ribeiro, A. S., Tomeleri, C. M., Schoenfeld, B. J., Silva, A. M., Souza, M. F., Nascimento, M. A., Sardinha, L. B., & Cyrino, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
  • Universidade Norte do Paraná (BR)
  • Lehman College (US)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual do Paraná (BR)
  • Metabolism, Nutrition, and Exercise Laboratory, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil
Corresponding author
Cunha, Paolo M.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2017-11-10
Volume
36
Issue
14
Pages
1564-1571
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2767645642
Cited by
88
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
resistance training, training volume, osteosarcopenic obesity, older women, muscle strength, body composition, body fat percentage, skeletal muscle mass, bone mineral density, sarcopenia, osteoporosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Obesity, Syndrome, Weight Lifting, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review