Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Customer engagement and purchase intention in live-streaming digital marketing platforms: 实时流媒体数字营销平台中的客户参与和购买意向

Clement Addo, Prince, Fang, Jiaming, Asare, Andy Ohemeng, Kulbo, Nora Bakabbey·2021·The Service Industries Journal
DOI 10.1080/02642069.2021.1905798
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The lack of human and social cues and customer engagement impedes traditional e-commerce until the birth of social commerce. This study investigates how customer engagement in live-streaming digital marketing affects purchase intentions. The results of 1726 datasets from two e-commerce platforms suggest that customer engagement is significantly associated with followership and purchase intention in live-streaming digital marketing. Whiles price is a significant moderator, its effects become insignificant on their purchase intentions once consumers become followers. The results highlight the positive impacts of social elements, including likes, chats, visits, and exposure time in social commerce towards transactional (purchase) and non-transactional (followership) benefits. Finally, the paper introduces a new perception of measuring customer engagement in live-streaming digital marketing and calls for further research into this new paradigm of social commerce to promote business and service provisions even with the restrictions of COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02642069.2021.1905798

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Addo P. C., 2020, International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 31, 191
  2. 10.1080/02642069.2020.1751823 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/15332861.2017.1422667 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1094428110397773 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1108/JRIM-06-2016-0065 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/02642069.2019.1579798 · DOI
  7. 10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0024 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.665935 · DOI
  9. 10.1108/IntR-02-2013-0023 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1094670511411703 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.5172/impp.2013.15.3.326 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1094428111428817 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chang C.-W., 2019, The Service Industries Journal, 1
  15. Chen J., 2019, International conference on management science and engineering management, 1002, 668
  16. 10.1080/02642069.2018.1508457 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.04.002 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.010 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00347.x · DOI
  20. 10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-76 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/02642069.2018.1561874 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/09669580903464232 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Feng C., 2014, Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26, 105
  25. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.028 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1108/01409171211256578 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2753/JEC1086-4415100202 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.4018/978-1-5225-9697-4.ch008 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.intmar.2015.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.elerap.2012.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/02642069.2019.1576641 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jretai.2016.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1108/MIP-11-2019-0582 · DOI
  35. 10.4018/978-1-5225-7362-3.ch076 · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7362-3.ch076
  36. 10.1145/2187980.2188259 · DOI
  37. 10.1509/jm.75.2.93 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1080/02642069.2018.1520219 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.11111/jkana.2013.19.2.187 · doi:10.11111/jkana.2013.19.2.187
  41. Li D., 2020, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  42. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.022 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.06.011 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.057 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Mäntymäki, M. & Salo, J. (2010). Trust, social presence and customer loyalty in social virtual worlds. In 23rd bled eConference eTrust: Implications for the individual, enterprises and society - proceedings (pp. 49–64).
  47. Mcmillan S. J., 2013, Psychology (Savannah, Ga ), 25, 756
  48. 10.1787/18152031 · DOI
  49. 10.1108/02634500610641552 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1023/A:1006226129868 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1108/ITP-03-2015-0069 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.029 · DOI
  53. 10.24251/HICSS.2018.451 · DOI
  54. Pires K., 2015, MMSys DataSet, 225
  55. 10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00026-3 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.014 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1080/02642069.2019.1570154 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.013 · DOI
  59. 10.1108/BFJ-04-2016-0164 · DOI
  60. 10.1108/00251741211203551 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.036 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Sun Y., 2019, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 1
  63. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102303 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Toor A., 2017, Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 10
  66. 10.1109/TNET.2005.863709 · DOI
  67. 10.1145/2483977.2483993 · DOI
  68. 10.2753/MTP1069-6679220404 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231255 · DOI
  70. Wongkitrungrueng A., 2018, Journal of Business Research, 117, 543
  71. 10.1108/ITP-08-2013-0144 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.14738/abr.81.7429 · DOI

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Clement Addo, P., Fang, J., Asare, A. O., & Kulbo, N. B.
Venue
The Service Industries Journal
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2021-03-29
Volume
41
Issue
11-12
Pages
767-786
ISSN
  • 0264-2069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9507
DOI
10.1080/02642069.2021.1905798
OpenAlex
W3147971674
Cited by
222
References
9
FWCI
54.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.