The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Education policy as an act of white supremacy: whiteness, critical race theory and education reform
Abstract
The paper presents an empirical analysis of education policy in England that is informed by recent developments in US critical theory. In particular, I draw on ‘whiteness studies’ and the application of critical race theory (CRT). These perspectives offer a new and radical way of conceptualizing the role of racism in education. Although the US literature has paid little or no regard to issues outside North America, I argue that a similar understanding of racism (as a multifaceted, deeply embedded, often taken‐for‐granted aspect of power relations) lies at the heart of recent attempts to understand institutional racism in the UK. Having set out the conceptual terrain in the first half of the paper, I then apply this approach to recent changes in the English education system to reveal the central role accorded the defence (and extension) of race inequity. Finally, the paper touches on the question of racism and intentionality: although race inequity may not be a planned and deliberate goal of education policy neither is it accidental. The patterning of racial advantage and inequity is structured in domination and its continuation represents a form of tacit intentionality on the part of white powerholders and policy‐makers. It is in this sense that education policy is an act of white supremacy. Following others in the CRT tradition, therefore, the paper’s analysis concludes that the most dangerous form of ‘white supremacy’ is not the obvious and extreme fascistic posturing of small neo‐nazi groups, but rather the taken‐for‐granted routine privileging of white interests that goes unremarked in the political mainstream.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement
Caldwell, V. F., & Crenshaw, K. W. (1996) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123408 · Cited by 3,897
Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146819509700104 · Cited by 3,881
White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness
Frankenburg, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203973431 · Cited by 3,308
The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Sociology of Education
(2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203464106 · Cited by 307 · cited 6×
“The Stephen Lawrence inquiry defined institutional racism as: The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities
Tuck, E. (2009) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15 · Cited by 2,857
Annamma, S. A., Jackson, D. D., & Morrison, D. (2017) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837 · Cited by 738
The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education
(2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203863701 · Cited by 600
The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis
Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P.-L. (2014) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.916007 · Cited by 337
Shahjahan, R. A. (2011) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2010.508176 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillborn*, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Education Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-505
- ISSN
- 0268-0939 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5106
- OpenAlex
- W2023926617
- Cited by
- 1,190
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 38.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Education policy as an act of white supremacy: whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02680930500132346
- The paper
- Gillborn*, D. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500132346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.