The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anger, coping, and frontal cortical activity: The effect of coping potential on anger-induced left frontal activity
Abstract
The present research tested whether relative left midfrontal cortical activity would be greater when individuals believed they could engage in behaviour to ameliorate an anger-inducing situation as compared to when they believed they could do nothing. The research also examined whether relative left midfrontal cortical activity would relate to behaviors aimed at ameliorating the anger-inducing situation, when individuals believed they could do something. To test these primary hypotheses, university students who were opposed to a tuition increase at their university were exposed to a pilot radio editorial that argued for increased tuition, and their electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, self-reported emotions, and behavioural responses were then collected. Prior to hearing the editorial, participants were led to believe that the tuition increase would definitely occur or that the tuition increase may occur and that petitions were being circulated to attempt to prevent it. Results supported the primary hypotheses and also revealed that relative left midfrontal activity was associated with anger in response to the editorial and that the effects were specific to the midfrontal cortical regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452 · Cited by 4,693
Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: Perspectives from affective neuroscience.
Davidson, R. J., Jackson, D. C., & Kalin, N. H. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.890 · Cited by 1,322
Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939308409189 · Cited by 1,302
Prefrontal Brain Asymmetry: A Biological Substrate of the Behavioral Approach and Inhibition Systems
Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00413.x · Cited by 1,263
Neuroanatomical correlates of pleasant and unpleasant emotion
Lane, R. D., Reiman, E. M., Bradley, M. M., Lang, P. J., Ahern, G. L., Davidson, R. J., & Schwartz, G. E. (1997) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00070-5 · Cited by 830
The Cook-Medley hostility scale: item content and ability to predict survival.
Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Williams, R. B. (1989) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-198901000-00005 · Cited by 825
Davidson, R. J. (1998) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577298000134 · Cited by 646
If it's not left, it's right: Electroencephalograph asymmetry and the development of emotion.
Fox, N. A. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.8.863 · Cited by 438
Wright, R. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80007-1 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion
Coan, J. A., & Allen, J. J. B. (2004) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002 · Cited by 1,426
Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review
Hajcak, G., MacNamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640903526504 · Cited by 1,370
Anger and the behavioral approach system
Harmon-Jones, E. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00313-6 · Cited by 446
Self-citationOn the importance of both dimensional and discrete models of emotion
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Summerell, E. (2017) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs7040066 · Cited by 201
Self-citationYzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028 · Cited by 133
Nusslock, R., Walden, K., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.06.004 · Cited by 95
Self-citationFor which side the bell tolls: the laterality of approach-avoidance associative networks
Fetterman, A. K., Ode, S., & Robinson, M. D. (2013) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9306-5 · Cited by 33
“Moreover, anger inductions shift the EEG asymmetry leftward (Harmon-Jones et al. 2003), good evidence for the motivational hypothesis.”
Watford, T. S., & Stafford, J. (2015) · Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000039 · Cited by 25
Intentionality in frontal asymmetry research
Hewig, J. (2018) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12852 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Harmon-Jones, E., Sigelman, J., Bohlig, A., & Harmon-Jones, C.
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2026368799
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
