Cited by 25Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The impact of mindfulness on emotion dysregulation and psychophysiological reactivity under emotional provocation.

Watford, Tanya S., Stafford, Jane·2015·Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice

Abstract

The present study employed physiological measures and a working memory task in addition to self-report measures to seek a better understanding of the relationship between brief mindfulness training and the experience and regulation of emotion. Seventy undergraduate students at a small southern state university completed baseline measures of trait mindfulness and emotion regulation before experiencing a 15-minute recording (mindfulness or control), and then completing a state mindfulness measure. Participants then experienced an emotion induction (positive or negative), before completing state emotion dysregulation and affect measures, and then completing a working memory task, finishing with the state mindfulness measure again. Physiological measures were recorded throughout the experimental session. Results indicated that the mindfulness induction was sufficient to increase mindfulness, demonstrated by greater self-report of state mindfulness, greater L > R frontal brain asymmetry, and greater heart rate variability at the completion of the intervention as compared to the Control group. Further, participants receiving the mindfulness induction experienced greater emotional awareness, indicated by reporting greater positive affect regardless of induction and greater negative affect when experiencing a negative induction. Experiencing a negative emotion induction after mindfulness training also resulted in feeling more overwhelmed and unable to improve their emotional state, suggesting the mindfulness induction was successful in reducing emotional avoidance, but failed to improve emotion regulation capacity sufficiently to withstand the demands of an aversive emotional experience. These results have significant clinical implications since it appears that individuals may feel more dysregulated while initially experiencing increased mindfulness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cns0000039

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watford, T. S., & Stafford, J.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina Aiken (US)
Venue
Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice
Published
2015-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
90-109
ISSN
  • 2326-5523 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5531
OpenAlex
W2062201313
Cited by
25
References
89
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
mindfulness, emotional dysregulation, emotional reactivity, emotion induction, heart rate variability, emotional awareness, positive and negative affect, emotional avoidance, working memory, trait mindfulness, state mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review