Cited by 239Emotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

One versus many: capturing the use of multiple emotion regulation strategies in response to an emotion-eliciting stimulus

Aldao, Amelia, Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan·2013·Cognition & Emotion

Abstract

The past decade and a half has witnessed a renewed interest in the study of affective processes. James Gross' process model of emotion regulation has provided a theoretical framework for this approach. This model stipulates that individuals have a repertoire of emotion regulation strategies they use in order to modify their affect and/or the situations eliciting such affect. However, empirical investigations of the use of emotion regulation strategies have largely oversimplified this model by assuming that individuals use only one regulation strategy to manage the affect elicited by a given emotion-eliciting stimulus or situation. This is problematic because it has resulted in a limited understanding of the complex process by which individuals select and implement regulation strategies. In this brief report, we present findings suggesting that people spontaneously use multiple emotion regulation strategies in response to a brief disgust-eliciting film clip. We discuss implications for future empirical work on emotion regulation strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2012.739998

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals tend to respond to disgust-eliciting stimuli by deploying multiple emotion regulation strategies regardless of each strategy's adaptive utility.

    “A study by Aldao and Nolen-Hoeksema (2013) revealed that individuals tended to respond to disgust eliciting stimuli by deploying multiple emotion regulation strategies regardless of each strategy’s adaptive utility.”

    From The conditional process model of mindfulness and emotion regulation: An empirical test (2017) · cites this paper as Aldao and Nolen-Hoeksema (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Aldao, Amelia
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2013-06
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
753-760
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2060265205
Cited by
239
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotion regulation strategies, process model of emotion regulation, disgust, emotion induction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Social Control, Informal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review