Cited by 29Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeWomen's cancer prevention and management

Is expressive suppression harmful for Chinese American breast cancer survivors?

Open access
Lu, Qian, Tsai, William, Chu, Qiao, Xie, Jing·2018·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Emotion regulation strategies are important for cancer survivors’ adjustment. A growing literature has found it maladaptive to use expressive suppression (ES), defined as the active effort of inhibiting the expressive component of an emotional response. These studies, however, have been limited to cross-sectional designs and primarily European American samples, without considering other theoretically relevant constructs. Chinese culture encourages emotion suppression to preserve interpersonal harmony and therefore it is important to understand what type of emotion suppression would be maladaptive and for whom. This study aimed to examine the unique longitudinal effects of ES, ambivalence over emotional expression (i.e., inner conflict over emotional expression), and cognitive reappraisal on quality of life (QOL) among Chinese breast cancer survivors. We hypothesized that AEE would predict QOL above beyond ES and cognitive reappraisal would buffer potentially harmful effect of ES on QOL. A total of 103 participants completed a questionnaire assessing ES, AEE, cognitive reappraisal, and QOL at baseline and a questionnaire assessing QOL eight weeks later. It was found that baseline AEE predicted follow-up QOL above beyond ES but not vice versa; baseline ES predicted follow-up QOL only among those with low cognitive reappraisal. These findings suggest that expressive suppression may not be maladaptive for Chinese breast cancer survivors. Interventions should be developed to help Chinese breast cancer survivors to reduce AEE and increase cognitive reappraisal. Understanding the moderators and other theoretically important variables provide beneficial implications for improving the quality of life of Chinese breast cancer survivors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.03.171

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ambivalence over emotional expression is associated with lower follow-up quality of life beyond the effect of expressive suppression.

    “Ambivalence over emotional expression was associated with lower follow-up quality of life beyond the effect of expressive suppression [70].”
  • Improvements in physical quality of life were observed in studies that included treatment outcomes and/or adherence to physical exercise.

    “Similarly, improvements in physical quality of life were observed in studies that included treatment outcomes and/or adherence to physical exercise [51,58,65,68,70,72]; conversely, dysfunctional emotional management appeared associated with lower physical QoL as well as with fatigue and lower adherence to exercise.”

    From The Role of Emotion-Related Abilities in the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) say the study used a composite quality-of-life score that included physical well-being. The Results (Preliminary analysis and Regression analysis; pages unavailable) examine associations between emotional regulation and overall quality of life, but do not report improvements in physical quality of life linked to treatment outcomes or exercise adherence. Searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Q., Tsai, W., Chu, Q., & Xie, J.
Affiliations
  • California State University, San Marcos (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
109
Pages
51-56
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802926974
Cited by
29
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA180896)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
expressive suppression, breast cancer survivors, Chinese Americans, ambivalence over emotional expression, cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, quality of life, interpersonal harmony
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asian, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review