Cited by 187Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

A contextual approach to experiential avoidance and social anxiety: Evidence from an experimental interaction and daily interactions of people with social anxiety disorder.

Open access
Kashdan, Todd B., Goodman, Fallon R., Machell, Kyla A., Kleiman, Evan M., Monfort, Samuel S., Ciarrochi, Joseph, Nezlek, John B.·2014·Emotion

Abstract

Experiential avoidance (EA), the tendency to avoid internal, unwanted thoughts and feelings, is hypothesized to be a risk factor for social anxiety. Existing studies of experiential avoidance rely on trait measures with minimal contextual consideration. In two studies, we examined the association between experiential avoidance and anxiety within real-world social interactions. In the first study, we examined the effect of experiential avoidance on social anxiety in everyday life. For 2 weeks, 37 participants with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) and 38 healthy controls provided reports of experiential avoidance and social anxiety symptoms during face-to-face social interactions. Results showed that momentary experiential avoidance was positively related to anxiety symptoms during social interactions and this effect was stronger among people with SAD. People low in EA showed greater sensitivity to the level of situational threat than high EA people. In the second study, we facilitated an initial encounter between strangers. Unlike Study 1, we experimentally created a social situation where there was either an opportunity for intimacy (self-disclosure conversation) or no such opportunity (small-talk conversation). Results showed that greater experiential avoidance during the self-disclosure conversation temporally preceded increases in social anxiety for the remainder of the interaction; no such effect was found in the small-talk conversation. Our findings provide insight into the association between experiential avoidance on social anxiety in laboratory and naturalistic settings, and demonstrate that the effect of EA depends upon level of social threat and opportunity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035935

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiential avoidance is a mechanism that can be changed through intervention.

    “EA is a mechanism malleable to intervention (Kashdan et al., 2014).”

    From Evaluating Experiential Avoidance in terms of COVID-19 Fear and Pandemic Emotional Distress Symptoms Among Latinx Adults (2022) · cites this paper as Kashdan et al., 2014

    The Study 2 Discussion reports reasonable evidence that experiential avoidance causally influences social anxiety, and the General Discussion says its use is influenced by situational factors. But the paper does not report an intervention that changes experiential avoidance or establish that it is malleable through treatment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In non-clinical adolescent samples, experiential avoidance is positively correlated with social anxiety.

    “Regarding adolescents’ social anxiety difficulties, existing research with non-clinical samples has also demonstrated that experiential avoidance is positively correlated with social anxiety (Kashdan et al., 2014; Papachristou et al., 2018; Shimoda et al., 2018), as well as cognitive fusion (Cheng et al., 2021).”

    From Psychological inflexibility explains social anxiety over time: a mediation analyses with a clinical adolescent sample (2024) · cites this paper as Kashdan et al., 2014

    The Abstract reports a positive association between momentary experiential avoidance and social anxiety, and the General Discussion identifies Study 2 as non-clinical. However, Study 2’s Method describes undergraduates aged 18–49 (mean 22.11), not an adolescent sample. Its reported effect was also specific to the self-disclosure conversation, with no such effect in the small-talk condition. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Experiential avoidance has been identified as one potential mechanism driving SAD.

    “Experiential avoidance, or EA, has been identified as one potential mechanism driving SAD (Glick & Orsillo, 2011;Kashdan et al., 2006Kashdan et al., , 2014)).”

    From Evaluating Mechanisms: Mapping Weekly Dynamics between Experiential Avoidance and SAD Symptoms (2021) · cites this paper as Kashdan et al., 2014

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Kashdan et al. (2014) provided an excellent example of using a contextual approach to assess experiential avoidance.

    “Kashdan et al. (2014) provided an excellent example of using a contextual approach to assess experiential avoidance.”
  • Kashdan et al. (2014) found that EA significantly predicted higher social anxiety in social situations with greater chance of being vulnerable and negatively evaluated compared with situations where self-disclosure was minimized.

    “Kashdan et al. (2014) also found context to be important, as EA significantly predicted higher social anxiety in social situations where there was a greater chance of being vulnerable and negatively evaluated by others compared with social situations where personal self-disclosure was minimized.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 2002 Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, non-patient edition New York Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute
  2. Hart TA Jack MAS Turk CL Heimberg RG 1999 Issues for the measurement of social phobia Westenburg HGM den Boer JA Social Phobia: Recent trends and progress 133 155 Amsterdam Syn-Thesis Publishers

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kashdan, T. B., Goodman, F. R., Machell, K. A., Kleiman, E. M., Monfort, S. S., Ciarrochi, J., & Nezlek, J. B.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • William & Mary (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2014-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
769-781
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2102502640
Cited by
187
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7
FWCI
16.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21-MH073937)
  • George Mason University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
experiential avoidance, social anxiety disorder, social anxiety, social danger, self-disclosure, small talk, social interaction, everyday life, contextual factors, risk factors for anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Phobic Disorders, Social Behavior, Social Control, Informal, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review