Cited by 159Physical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Assessment of Physical Activity in Older Adults

Washburn, Richard A.·2000·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082790

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Washburn, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Washburn, Richard A.
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2000-06
Volume
71
Issue
sup2
Pages
79-87
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W1982036519
Cited by
159
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
physical activity measurement, older adults, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Epidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review