Cited by 66Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Quantifying the Predictive Performance of Objectively Measured Physical Activity on Mortality in the UK Biobank

Open access
Leroux, Andrew, Xu, Shiyao, Kundu, Prosenjit, Muschelli, John, Smirnova, Ekaterina, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Crainiceanu, Ciprian·2021·The Journals of Gerontology: Series A

Abstract

Background: Objective measures of physical activity (PA) derived from wrist-worn accelerometers are compared with traditional risk factors in terms of mortality prediction performance in the UK Biobank. Method: A subset of participants in the UK Biobank study wore a tri-axial wrist-worn accelerometer in a free-living environment for up to 7 days. A total of 82 304 individuals over the age of 50 (439 707 person-years of follow-up, 1959 deaths) had both accelerometry data that met specified quality criteria and complete data on a set of traditional mortality risk factors. Predictive performance was assessed using cross-validated Concordance (C) for Cox regression models. Forward selection was used to obtain a set of best predictors of mortality. Results: In univariate Cox regression, age was the best predictor of all-cause mortality (C = 0.681) followed by 12 PA predictors, led by minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (C = 0.661) and total acceleration (C = 0.661). Overall, 16 of the top 20 predictors were objective PA measures (C = 0.578–0.661). Using a threshold of 0.001 improvement in Concordance, the Concordance for the best model that did not include PA measures was 0.735 (9 covariates) compared with 0.748 (12 covariates) for the best model with PA variables (p-value < .001). Conclusions: Objective measures of PA derived from accelerometry outperform traditional predictors of all-cause mortality in the UK Biobank except age and substantially improve the prediction performance of mortality models based on traditional risk factors. Results confirm and complement previous findings in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glaa250

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing studies have demonstrated that objectively measured physical activity could be a potential predictor for cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality in the general population.

    “In addition, existing studies have demonstrated that objectively measured PA could be a potential predicator for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and cancer mortality in the general population15,16.”

    From Accelerometer-derived physical activity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page not provided) report that objectively measured physical activity predicts all-cause mortality among UK Biobank participants over 50. They do not report separate predictions for cardiovascular-disease or cancer mortality, and the studied cohort does not establish the claim for the general population. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leroux, A., Xu, S., Kundu, P., Muschelli, J., Smirnova, E., Chatterjee, N., & Crainiceanu, C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Leroux, Andrew
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
Published
2020-09-30
Volume
76
Issue
8
Pages
1486-1494
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W3091619687
Cited by
66
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • National Institutes of Health (R01NS060910)
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG000247)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
physical activity, mortality prediction, accelerometry, objective physical activity measurement, all-cause mortality, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, older adults, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Physical Functional Performance, Age Factors, Aged, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Nutrition Surveys, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Exercise, Proportional Hazards Models, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Risk Assessment, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review