Cited by 135Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsSport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education Research

Learning Benefits of Self-Controlled Knowledge of Results in 10-Year-Old Children

Chiviacowsky, Suzete, Wulf, Gabriele, de Medeiros, Franklin Laroque, Kaefer, Angélica, Tani, Go·2008·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599505

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enhanced learning with self-controlled feedback has been found with various movement tasks, including throwing, timing, perceptual invariants, and landing a virtual aircraft.

    “Enhanced learning with self-controlled feedback has been found with various movement tasks, including throwing tasks, in which feedback was provided about movement form (Janelle, Barba, Frehlich, Tennant, & Cauraugh, 1997) or the accuracy of the throws (Chiviacowsky, Wulf, Laroque de Medeiros, Kaefer, & Tani, 2008).Other researchers have found learning advantages of self-controlled feedback for”
  • Groups with self-controlled feedback tend to receive feedback more after good trials than after poor trials compared with control groups.

    “Groups with self-controlled feedback tend to receive feedback more after good trials (i.e., with smaller errors) than after poor trials compared with control groups (Chiviacowsky & Wulf, 2002;Chiviacowsky, Wulf, Medeiros, Kaefer, & Tani, 2008;Patterson & Carter, 2010;Patterson, Carter, & Sanli, 2011).”

    From Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (2016) · cites this paper as Chiviacowsky, Wulf, Medeiros, Kaefer, & Tani, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., de Medeiros, F. L., Kaefer, A., & Tani, G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2008-09
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
405-410
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W2156017293
Cited by
135
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
feedback, learning, children, motor skill learning, self-regulation
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Child, Choice Behavior, Humans, Knowledge of Results, Psychological, Learning, Practice, Psychological, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review