Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards

Sadler, D. Royce·1987·Oxford Review of Education

Abstract

Assessment practices, both at the classroom level and for the award of certificates, have traditionally followed norm‐referenced principles, although in recent years there has been an increasing interest in criterion‐referenced assessment. In the first part of this article, another approach (referred to as standards‐referenced assessment) is outlined. Sharing much of the motivation and philosophy of criterion‐referenced assessment, it makes direct and extensive use of teachers’ qualitative judgments. In principle, standards‐referenced assessment is applicable to a wide variety of school subjects, and attempts to provide external, visible standards for the use of both teachers and students. In the second part of the article, four methods of specifying and promulgating educational standards are identified and described. The four make use of numerical cut‐offs, tacit knowledge, exemplars, and verbal descriptions. It is argued that the last two of these taken together provide the most promising framework for a standards‐referenced assessment system within which teachers may make sound qualitative judgments about the achievements of their students both for improving learning and for summative reporting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0305498870130207

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3102/00346543056001137 · doi:10.3102/00346543056001137 · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00226.x · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00226.x
  4. Black , H.D. and Dockrell , W.B. 1984 . Criterion‐referenced Assessment in the Classroom , Edinburgh : Scottish Council for Research in Education .
  5. Chapman , J.C. and Rush , G.P. 1917 . The Scientific Measurement of Classroom Products , Boston : Silver‐Burdett .
  6. Christie , T. and Forrest , G.M. 1981 . Defining Public Examination Standards, , London : Macmillan . Schools Council Research Studies
  7. Clark , F. and Twining , J. 1966 . Standards of Welding Achievement During Training , London : Heinemann .
  8. Edgeworth , F.Y. 1890 . The element of chance in competitive examinations, . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , 53 : 460 – 475 . 644 – 663 .
  9. Glaser , R. and Nitko , A.J. 1971 . “ Measurement in learning and instruction ” . In Educational Measurement, , 2nd edn , Edited by: Thorndike , R.L. 625 – 670 . Washington, DC : American Council on Education .
  10. 10.1037/h0049294 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00072.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Goodman , P. 1971 . Compulsory Miseducation , Harmondsworth : Penguin .
  13. 10.1126/science.194.4263.389 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2307/2801872 · DOI
  15. Hartog , P. and Rhodes , E.C. 1936 . The Marks of Examiners , London : Macmillan .
  16. 10.3102/01623737002004019 · doi:10.3102/01623737002004019
  17. Hudson , B. 1973 . Assessment Techniques: an introduction , London : Methuen .
  18. Ingram , D.E. and Wylie , E. 1981 . Australian Second Language Proficiency Ratings (ASLPR) , Canberra : Australian Government Publishing Service .
  19. Kaplan , A. 1964 . The Conduct of Inquiry: methodology for behavioral science , San Francisco : Chandler .
  20. Merrell , F. 1982 . Semiotic Foundations: steps toward an epistemology of written texts , Bloomington : Indiana University Press .
  21. 10.3102/00346543046001133 · DOI
  22. 10.3102/00346543050003461 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1986.00233.x · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1986.00233.x
  24. 10.1080/00221546.1983.11778152 · doi:10.1080/00221546.1983.11778152
  25. 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1985.00285.x · DOI
  26. Sadler , D.R. 1986 . Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Teachers’ Qualitative Judgments, , Assessment Unit Discussion Paper 5 Brisbane : Board of Secondary School Studies .
  27. Scriven , M. 1980 . The Logic of Evaluation , Inverness, California : Edgepress .
  28. Starch , D. 1918 . Educational Measurements , New York : Macmillan .
  29. Suhor , C. 1985 . Objective tests and writing samples: how do they affect instruction in composition? . Phil Delta Kappan , 66 (a) : 635 – 639 .
  30. 10.1177/016146811001100210 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/016146811301400502 · doi:10.1177/016146811301400502
  32. 10.1037/h0074876 · doi:10.1037/h0074876
  33. Thorndike , R.L. 1982 . “ Educational measurement: theory and practice ” . In The Improvement of Measurement in Education and Psychology, , Edited by: Spearritt , D. Melbourne : Australian Council for Educational Research . Chapter 1
  34. 10.1080/0013191850370105 · doi:10.1080/0013191850370105
  35. 10.1093/mind/LIX.234.145 · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.234.145
  36. Wittgenstein , L. 1974 . Philosophical Investigations , Edited by: Anscombe , G.E.M. Oxford : Basil Blackwell . from the 1967 original 3rd edn].
  37. Worthen , B.R. and Sanders , J.R. 1973 . Educational Evaluation: theory and practice , Belmont, California : Wadsworth .
  38. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Sadler, D. R.
Venue
Oxford Review of Education
Published
1987-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
191-209
ISSN
  • 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3915
OpenAlex
W2116983997
Cited by
350
References
2
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0305498870130207
The paper
Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards. Oxford Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498870130207

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.