The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards
Abstract
Assessment practices, both at the classroom level and for the award of certificates, have traditionally followed norm‐referenced principles, although in recent years there has been an increasing interest in criterion‐referenced assessment. In the first part of this article, another approach (referred to as standards‐referenced assessment) is outlined. Sharing much of the motivation and philosophy of criterion‐referenced assessment, it makes direct and extensive use of teachers’ qualitative judgments. In principle, standards‐referenced assessment is applicable to a wide variety of school subjects, and attempts to provide external, visible standards for the use of both teachers and students. In the second part of the article, four methods of specifying and promulgating educational standards are identified and described. The four make use of numerical cut‐offs, tacit knowledge, exemplars, and verbal descriptions. It is argued that the last two of these taken together provide the most promising framework for a standards‐referenced assessment system within which teachers may make sound qualitative judgments about the achievements of their students both for improving learning and for summative reporting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reliability of the Grading of High-School Work in English
Starch, D., & Elliott, E. C. (1912) · The School Review · doi:10.1086/435971 · Cited by 142
Education and distributive justice: Some reflections on grading systems.
Deutsch, M. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.5.391 · Cited by 108
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3102/00346543056001137 · doi:10.3102/00346543056001137 · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00226.x · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00226.x
- Black , H.D. and Dockrell , W.B. 1984 . Criterion‐referenced Assessment in the Classroom , Edinburgh : Scottish Council for Research in Education .
- Chapman , J.C. and Rush , G.P. 1917 . The Scientific Measurement of Classroom Products , Boston : Silver‐Burdett .
- Christie , T. and Forrest , G.M. 1981 . Defining Public Examination Standards, , London : Macmillan . Schools Council Research Studies
- Clark , F. and Twining , J. 1966 . Standards of Welding Achievement During Training , London : Heinemann .
- Edgeworth , F.Y. 1890 . The element of chance in competitive examinations, . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , 53 : 460 – 475 . 644 – 663 .
- Glaser , R. and Nitko , A.J. 1971 . “ Measurement in learning and instruction ” . In Educational Measurement, , 2nd edn , Edited by: Thorndike , R.L. 625 – 670 . Washington, DC : American Council on Education .
- 10.1037/h0049294 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00072.x · DOI · Paper page
- Goodman , P. 1971 . Compulsory Miseducation , Harmondsworth : Penguin .
- 10.1126/science.194.4263.389 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2801872 · DOI
- Hartog , P. and Rhodes , E.C. 1936 . The Marks of Examiners , London : Macmillan .
- 10.3102/01623737002004019 · doi:10.3102/01623737002004019
- Hudson , B. 1973 . Assessment Techniques: an introduction , London : Methuen .
- Ingram , D.E. and Wylie , E. 1981 . Australian Second Language Proficiency Ratings (ASLPR) , Canberra : Australian Government Publishing Service .
- Kaplan , A. 1964 . The Conduct of Inquiry: methodology for behavioral science , San Francisco : Chandler .
- Merrell , F. 1982 . Semiotic Foundations: steps toward an epistemology of written texts , Bloomington : Indiana University Press .
- 10.3102/00346543046001133 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543050003461 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1986.00233.x · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1986.00233.x
- 10.1080/00221546.1983.11778152 · doi:10.1080/00221546.1983.11778152
- 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1985.00285.x · DOI
- Sadler , D.R. 1986 . Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Teachers’ Qualitative Judgments, , Assessment Unit Discussion Paper 5 Brisbane : Board of Secondary School Studies .
- Scriven , M. 1980 . The Logic of Evaluation , Inverness, California : Edgepress .
- Starch , D. 1918 . Educational Measurements , New York : Macmillan .
- Suhor , C. 1985 . Objective tests and writing samples: how do they affect instruction in composition? . Phil Delta Kappan , 66 (a) : 635 – 639 .
- 10.1177/016146811001100210 · DOI
- 10.1177/016146811301400502 · doi:10.1177/016146811301400502
- 10.1037/h0074876 · doi:10.1037/h0074876
- Thorndike , R.L. 1982 . “ Educational measurement: theory and practice ” . In The Improvement of Measurement in Education and Psychology, , Edited by: Spearritt , D. Melbourne : Australian Council for Educational Research . Chapter 1
- 10.1080/0013191850370105 · doi:10.1080/0013191850370105
- 10.1093/mind/LIX.234.145 · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.234.145
- Wittgenstein , L. 1974 . Philosophical Investigations , Edited by: Anscombe , G.E.M. Oxford : Basil Blackwell . from the 1967 original 3rd edn].
- Worthen , B.R. and Sanders , J.R. 1973 . Educational Evaluation: theory and practice , Belmont, California : Wadsworth .
- 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationBeyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Sadler, D. R. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930903541015 · Cited by 1,138
Self-citationFormative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory
Sadler, D. R. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050104 · Cited by 1,107
Self-citationInterpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education
Sadler *, D. R. (2005) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293042000264262 · Cited by 601
Self-citationIndeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading
Sadler, D. R. (2009) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930801956059 · Cited by 489
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Venue
- Oxford Review of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-209
- ISSN
- 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3915
- OpenAlex
- W2116983997
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0305498870130207
- The paper
- Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards. Oxford Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498870130207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.