Cited by 64Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEducation Discipline and Inequality

Truancy: a look at definitions in the USA and other territories

Open access
Gentle-Genitty, Carolyn, Karikari, Isaac, Chen, Haiping, Wilka, Eric, Kim, Jangmin·2015·Educational Studies

Abstract

There is no shortage of definitions for truancy. One state may house many different definitions and there are a variety of challenges arising from this fact. One of the most important to researchers, policy-makers and educators alike, is that because of the lack of uniformity and consistency, it is difficult to compile and ascertain the totality of the phenomenon. The lack of a consistent definition influences a wide range of outcomes including policy matters, financial resources and definitive responses and intervention strategies. This manuscript attempts to synthesise the literature through the examination of operational definitions of truancy in the USA and in other territories. In addition to these operational definitions, expert opinions from focus groups proposed an enhanced definition of truancy. The study is qualitative and uses focus groups and synthesis of the literature to frame the work. Findings are presented. The goal is to synthesise the literature, not in its entirety, but in an attempt to combine and inform the conversation on a definition of truancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03055698.2014.955734

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  2. McDonald Brown, C., & Birrane, K.A. (1994). What's happening to our children? Maryland Journal, 27(3), 35-39.
  3. Reid, K. (2007). An evaluation of ofsted reports on LEAs' management of attendance issues. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(3), 395-413.
  4. Toby, J. (1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity. Journal of Crime Law & Criminology, 48, 12-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gentle-Genitty, C., Karikari, I., Chen, H., Wilka, E., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Gentle-Genitty, Carolyn
Venue
Educational Studies
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
41
Issue
1-2
Pages
62-90
ISSN
  • 0305-5698 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3400
OpenAlex
W2151346987
Cited by
64
References
87
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
13.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
truancy, school absenteeism, operational definitions, intervention strategies, expert opinion, United States, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review