Cited by 78Student Stress and CopingMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental Health

CORE-OM mental health norms of students attending university counselling services benchmarked against an age-matched primary care sample

Connell, Janice, Barkham, Michael, Mellor-Clark, John·2007·British Journal of Guidance & Counselling

Abstract

Whilst concern has been expressed at the increasing severity of the mental health of students, there has been very little research on this growing population outside of small, single institution studies. The aims of this paper are to provide CORE Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) norms for the psychological health of students across multiple sites receiving university counselling, and benchmark these against an age-matched sample of people receiving treatment in NHS primary care settings. Results indicate that students using university counselling services show severity levels only marginally lower than young people presenting in primary care, with the differences being at a functional/relationship rather than a symptomatic level and with levels of risk to self being similar. This suggests that university counselling services deliver a service to people who closely resemble NHS primary care clients in terms of severity and risk to self.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03069880601106781

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The level of mental health problems among third-level students was estimated to continue to rise as a result of stressors such as financial concerns, pressures to excel in their studies, and meeting ever increasing social and personal expectations.

    “According to the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP) in the UK (2003), the level of mental health problems among third-level students was estimated to continue to rise as a result of stressors such as financial concerns, pressures to excel in their studies, and meeting ever increasing social and personal expectations (Connell et al., 2007; Houghton et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Connell, J., Barkham, M., & Mellor-Clark, J.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Guidance & Counselling
Published
2007-02
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
41-57
ISSN
  • 0306-9885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3534
OpenAlex
W2099577799
Cited by
78
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Guidance and Counselling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
student mental health, university counseling services, core outcome measures, benchmarking, primary care, self-harm risk, functional disability, relationship problems, youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review