Cited by 919Student Stress and CopingHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutHigher Education Research Studies

The relation of depression and anxiety to life-stress and achievement in students

Andrews, Bernice, Wilding, John M.·2004·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: An apparent increase in seriously disturbed students consulting student health services in the UK has led to concern that increasing financial difficulties and other outside pressures may affect student mental health and academic performance. The current research investigated whether student anxiety and depression increases after college entry, the extent to which adverse life experiences contribute to any increases, and the impact of adversity, anxiety and depression on exam performance. METHOD: 351 UK-domiciled undergraduates completed questionnaires one month before university entry and mid-course. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS: Zigmond & Snaith, 1983) was administered at both time points and a modified List of Threatening Experiences (Brugha, Bebbington, Tennant, & Hurry, 1985) was administered mid-course. RESULTS: By mid-course 9% of previously symptom-free students became depressed and 20% became anxious at a clinically significant level. Of those previously anxious or depressed 36% had recovered. After adjusting for pre-entry symptoms, financial difficulties made a significant independent contribution to depression and relationship difficulties independently predicted anxiety. Depression and financial difficulties mid-course predicted a decrease in exam performance from first to second year. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to confirm empirically that financial and other difficulties can increase British students' levels of anxiety and depression and that financial difficulties and depression can affect academic performance. However, university life may also have a beneficial effect for some students with pre-existing conditions. With widening participation in higher education, the results have important implications for educational and health policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/0007126042369802

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, B., & Wilding, J. M.
Affiliations
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Andrews, Bernice
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
509-521
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2128592988
Cited by
919
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 37
FWCI
14.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
depression, anxiety, university students, life events, financial hardship, academic performance, exam performance, relationship problems, student mental health, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, transition to college, recovery from depression
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Stress, Psychological, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review