Cited by 31Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Plasma-Saturating intakes of vitamin C confer maximal antioxidant protection to plasma

Johnston, Carol S., Cox, Sarah K.·2001·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Supplemental vitamin C has been shown to reduce oxidative damage in vivo, yet the dose-response relationship between vitamin C intake and antioxidant protection is not known. This report examined blood indicators of oxidative stress in subjects consuming graded doses of vitamin C, from 75 to 2,000 mg/day. METHODS: Ten healthy, non-smoking men and women (26.1 +/- 2.1 years) were recruited from a campus population. During the ten-week study, subjects limited fruit and vegetable consumption (< or = 3 servings/day) and consumed a multivitamin and mineral pill daily. Beginning at week 3, subjects ingested either a vitamin C (n = 8) or placebo (n = 2) capsule, which were identical in appearance and taste. The content of the vitamin C capsule increased every two weeks (from 250 mg at weeks 3-4 to 500 mg, 1,000 mg. and 2,000 mg at weeks 5-6. 7-8. 9-10, respectively). Fasting blood samples were collected at two-week intervals and analyzed for vitamin C, total lipid hydroperoxides and Heinz bodies in packed erythrocytes incubated 24 hours at 37 degrees. RESULTS: Plasma vitamin C rose 55% in vitamin C-supplemented subjects by the end of the ten-week treatment (p < 0.05), and measures of oxidative stress decreased 60% to 90% (8.1 +/- 0.6 to 3.5 +/- 0.4 nmol/mL and 69.1 +/- 7.8% to 6.7 +/- 6.0% for total lipid hydroperoxides and Heinz bodies, respectively). Significant decreases in markers of oxidative stress were noted at the 500 mg, 1,000 mg and 2,000 mg dosages versus placebo. Antioxidant protection was similar at the 1,000 mg and 2,000 mg dosage. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the antioxidant protection afforded by short-term vitamin C supplementation is maximal at the 500-1,000 mg dosage range.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2001.10719159

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnston, C. S., & Cox, S. K.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Johnston, Carol S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2001-12
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
623-627
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2050361512
Cited by
31
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
vitamin C, vitamin C supplementation, dose-response relationship, oxidative stress, antioxidant defense, plasma vitamin C, lipid hydroperoxides, Heinz bodies, erythrocytes, oxidative damage
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Female, Heinz Bodies, Humans, Lipid Peroxides, Male, Reference Values, Diet Records, Oxidative Stress, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review