Cited by 43Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

The Effects of Nitrate-Rich Supplementation on Neuromuscular Efficiency during Heavy Resistance Exercise

Flanagan, Shawn D., Looney, David P., Miller, Mark J. S., DuPont, William H., Pryor, Luke, Creighton, Brent C., Sterczala, Adam J., Szivak, Tunde K. +5 more·2016·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nitrate-rich (NR) supplements can enhance exercise performance by improving neuromuscular function and the aerobic cost of exercise. However, little is known about the effects of nitrate on dynamic, multijoint resistance exercise. METHODS: Fourteen resistance-trained men (age, 21.1 ± 0.9 years; height, 173.2 ± 2.9 cm: body mass, 77.6 ± 4.3 kg; squat one-repetition maximum [1RM], 127.5 ± 18.8 kg) participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover experiment. Subjects consumed an NR or nitrate-poor (NP) supplement for 3 days, performed a bout of heavy resistance exercise, completed a washout, and then repeated the procedures with the remaining supplement. Before, during, and after exercise, individual and gross motor unit efficiency was assessed during isometric and dynamic muscle contractions. In addition, we compared physical performance, heart rate, lactate, and oxygen consumption (VO2). RESULTS: Nitrate-rich supplementation resulted in lower initial muscle firing rates at rest and lower mean and maximum firing rates over the course of fatiguing exercise. Nitrate-poor supplementation was accompanied by increased mean and maximum firing rates by the end of exercise and lower initial firing rates. In addition, NR supplementation resulted in higher mean peak electromyography (EMG) amplitudes. Heart rate, lactate, and physical performance did not differ by treatment, but oxygen consumption increased more frequently when the NP supplement was consumed. CONCLUSION: Supplementation with an NR beetroot extract-based supplement provided neuromuscular advantages during metabolically taxing resistance exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2015.1081572

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flanagan, S. D., Looney, D. P., Miller, M. J. S., DuPont, W. H., Pryor, L., Creighton, B. C., Sterczala, A. J., Szivak, T. K., Hooper, D. R., Maresh, C. M., Volek, J. S., Ellis, L. A., & Kraemer, W. J.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Kraemer, William J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2016-02-17
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
100-107
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2297260541
Cited by
43
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
beetroot extract, neuromuscular efficiency, resistance training, motor unit firing rate, electromyography amplitude, muscle fatigue, oxygen consumption, lactate, heart rate, exercise performance, nitric oxide
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Nitrates, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Exercise, Plant Roots, Dietary Supplements, Beta vulgaris, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review