The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use
Open accessAbstract
:This study examines the psychometric properties of the short-form measure of user information satisfaction (uis) proposed by Ives, Olson, and Baroudi [7]. Based on extensive testing, the questionnaire appears to be a reasonably valid and reliable measure. A framework for how this measure can be used to detect and diagnose problems with user satisfaction is presented and illustrated via two case studies. Finally, recommendations and suggestions are made regarding the future use of this and other measures of user information satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530 · DOI · Paper page
- Campbell J. R., 1976, Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Cohen J., 1975, Applied Regression/Correlational Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
- Ginzberg M., 1979, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 13, 85
- 10.1145/358413.358430 · DOI · Paper page
- Kerlinger F., 1973, Foundations of Behavioral Research
- Kim J. O., 1982, Introduction to Factor Analysis
- Pearson, S. Measurement of computer user satisfaction. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, 1977.
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb02236.x · DOI · Paper page
- Stone E., 1978, Research Methods in Organizational Behavior
Cited by
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042 · Cited by 2,835
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611
Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,399
Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350
Metadata
- Authors
- Baroudi, J. J., & Orlikowski, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 44-59
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2167602338
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07421222.1988.11517807
- The paper
- Baroudi, J. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1988). A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1988.11517807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
