Cited by 49Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The daily life of complicated grief patients—What gets missed, what gets added?

Monk, Timothy H., Houck, Patricia R., Katherine Shear, M.·2006·Death Studies

Abstract

Many patients with complicated grief suffer severe symptoms for several years after the loss, interfering with daily life. We sought to determine which elements of a patient's daily routine were likely to be missed or added. Sixty-four patients completed a diary each evening for 2 weeks. The diary asked whether each of 13 daily life activities were done or missed on that day. Comparisons were made with 64 matched healthy control participants. Patients were significantly more likely than controls to miss contact with another person, breakfast, lunch, dinner, starting work, and going outside, and to add a nap and evening snack.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481180500348860

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 2-week diary investigation, bereaved people with complicated grief on average had fewer days they had contact with others, had breakfast, lunch, or dinner, started work, went outside, napped, or had an evening snack.

    “In a 2-week diary investigation of activity patterns, it was demonstrated that bereaved people with CG on average had less days they had contact with others, had breakfast, lunch, or dinner, started work, went outside, napped or had an evening snack (Monk et al., 2006).”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Monk et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monk, T. H., Houck, P. R., & Katherine Shear, M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Monk, Timothy H.
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2006-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
77-85
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W2054235909
Cited by
47
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (NAG9-1234, NNJ04HF76G)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 020677, R01AG013396, AG13396, P01AG020677)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-52247, P30MH052247, MH 060783, R01MH060783, MH30915)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000056, RR 00056)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
complicated grief, activities of daily living, daily routine, bereavement, activity diaries, social contact, dietary habits, sleep patterns, prolonged grief disorder
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Mental Disorders, Eating, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Sleep Wake Disorders, Social Behavior, United States, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review