Cited by 376Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health InterventionsDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Complicated Grief: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Wagner, Birgit, Knaevelsrud, Christine, Maercker, Andreas·2006·Death Studies

Abstract

The present study investigates the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy program for bereaved people suffering complicated grief. The program combines established methods of psychotherapy with new technology--therapists and patients communicated exclusively by e-mail. Bereaved individuals diagnosed with complicated grief (n = 55) were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or a waiting list control condition. The 5-week intervention consisted of three modules: (1) exposure to bereavement cues; (2) cognitive reappraisal; and (3) integration and restoration. The Impact of Event Scale (IES), a failure to adapt scale, and the depression and anxiety subscales of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) were used to assess treatment outcomes. Participants in the treatment group (n = 26) improved significantly relative to participants in the waiting condition on symptoms of intrusion, avoidance, maladaptive behavior, and general psychopathology, and showed a large treatment effect. Follow-up results show that this improvement was maintained after 3 months.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481180600614385

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Arnoldi J., 2000, De Risico Taxatielijst eigenschappen van een kort screeningsintrument
  2. Derogatis L. R., 1992, BSI: administration, scoring, and procedures manual-II ()
  3. Kubany E. S., 1997, NCP Clinical Quarterly, 7, 6
  4. Lange A., 2000, Directieve Therapie, 20, 162
  5. 10.1002/jts.2490070310 · DOI
  6. Neimeyer R. A., 2001, Coping with stress, 47
  7. Pennebaker J. W., 1988, Journal of Personality and Clinical Psychology, 56, 239
  8. Rosner , R. , Kruse , J. & Hagl , M. ( 2005 , June ). Quantitative and qualitative review of interventions for the bereaved . Paper presented at the 9th European Conference on Traumatic Stress (ECOTS). Stockholm .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 376

Metadata

Authors
Wagner, B., Knaevelsrud, C., & Maercker, A.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Birgit
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2006-06
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
429-453
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W2018552270
Cited by
376
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 22
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
complicated grief, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, bereavement, cognitive reappraisal, avoidance, depression, anxiety, maintenance of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Austria, Behavior Therapy, Germany, Grief, Humans, Switzerland, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review