CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

Personal recovery within positive psychiatry

Open access
Bejerholm, Ulrika, Roe, David·2018·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1080/08039488.2018.1492015
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One goal within positive psychiatry is to support the personal recovery of persons with mental illness and providing opportunities for well-being. AIM: The current article aims to introduce readers to the concept of personal recovery and the potential and importance of recovery-oriented services and measures. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to help consider the domains of 'personal recovery', 'recovery-oriented services/interventions', and 'measures'. A database search was complemented with a web-based search. Both medical subject heading (MESH) terms and free-text search terms were used. RESULTS: Literature from research journals, grey literature, and websites were included. Within this context, recovery does not refer to a cure but involves a process in which a person acts as an agent to develop new goals and meaning in life, despite and beyond limitations posed by the illness and its consequences. A positive focus on recovery is in sharp contrast to historical deterministic and pessimistic concepts of mental illnesses. Recovery-oriented services such as peer support, assertive community treatment, supported employment/education/housing, illness self-management, and decreasing self-stigma are highlighted. A review of 27 measures that focus on personal recovery and promotion of well-being are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The literature overview presents perspectives and knowledge of how to develop positive psychiatry, how mental health services and their partner organizations may become more recovery oriented and help persons reach well-being and a better quality of life. This study is limited to a narrative review and may precede future systematic reviews.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08039488.2018.1492015

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even severely mentally ill people still have their own resources and are accessible to psychosocial interventions that can significantly improve their situation and life satisfaction.

    “This is all the more true because even severely mentally ill people still have their own resources and are accessible to psychosocial interventions that can significantly improve their situation and life satisfaction. Corresponding approaches are usually summarized under the term recovery-oriented or positive psychiatry (40).”

    From Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 119

  1. Jeste D, Palmer B, Rettew D, et al. Positive psychiatry: its time has come. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:675-683.
  2. Leamy M, Bird V, LeBoutillier C, et al. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narra- tive synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199:445-452.
  3. Timmerby N, Austin S, Bech P. Positiv Psykiatri. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2016;178:V09150759.
  4. Harding C, Hall G. Long-term outcome studies of schizophrenia: do females continue to display better outcomes as expected?. Int Rev Psychiatry. 1997;9:409-418.
  5. Harding C, Brooks G, Ashikaga T, et al. The Vermont longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness, II: Long-term out- come of subjects who retrospectively met DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:727-735.
  6. Edwards J, Maude D, McGorry P, et al. Prolonged recovery in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;33:107-116.
  7. J€ a€ askel€ ainen E, Juola P, Hirvonen N, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39:1296-1306.
  8. Arvidsson H. Recovered or dead? A Swedish study of 321 per- sons surveyed as severely mentally ill in 1995/96 but not so ten years later. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011;20:55-63.
  9. Harrison G, Hopper K, Craig T, et al. Recovery from psychotic ill- ness: a 15-and 25-year international follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:506-517.
  10. Harrow M, Grossman LS, Jobe TH, et al. Do patients with schizo- phrenia ever show periods of recovery? A 15-year multi-follow- up study. Schizophr Bull. 2005;31:723-734.
  11. Thomas E, Despeaux K, Drapalski A, et al. Person-oriented recov- ery of individuals with serious mental illnesses: a review and meta-analysis of longitudinal findings. Psychiatr Serv. 2018; 69:259-267.
  12. Onken S, Craig C, Ridgway P, et al. An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: a review of the literature. Psychiatr Rehab J. 2007;31:9-22.
  13. Bellack A. Scientific and consumer models of recovery in schizo- phrenia: concordance, contrasts, and implications. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32:432-442.
  14. Bellack A, Drapalski A. Issues and developments on the con- sumer recovery construct. World Psychiatry. 2012;11:156-160.
  15. WHO. World Health Organisation. Mental Health Atlas 2011. Geneva: WHO; 2011:17.
  16. Slade M, Leamy M, Bacon F, et al. International differences in understanding recovery: Systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012;21:353-364.
  17. Aviram U, Ginat Y, Roe D. Mental health reforms in Europe: Israel's rehabilitation in the community of persons with mental disabilities law: Challenges and Opportunities. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63:110-112.
  18. Roe D, Barniv-Bril S, Kravetz S. Recovery in Israel: a legislative recovery response to the needs-rights paradox. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012;24:48-55.
  19. Sch€ on U-K, Rosenberg D. Transplanting recovery: research and practice in the Nordic countries. J Ment Health. 2013;22: 563-569.
  20. Bergmark M, Bejerholm U, Markstr€ om U. Policy changes in com- munity mental health. Interventions and strategies used in Sweden over 20 years. Soc Policy Adm. 2017;51:95-113.
  21. Collins JA, Fauser CJMB. Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:103-104.
  22. Slade M. Personal recovery and mental illness: a guide for men- tal health professionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
  23. Silverstein S, Bellack A. A scientific agenda for the concept of recovery as it applies to schizophrenia. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28:1108-1124.
  24. Leonhardt BL, Huling K, Hamm JA, et al. Recovery and serious mental illness: a review of current clinical and research para- digms and future directions. Expert Rev Neurother. 2017;17: 1117-1130.
  25. Richardson K, Barkham M. Recovery from depression: a system- atic review of perceptions and associated factors. J Ment Health. 2017;1-13.
  26. Thomas E, Muralidharan A, Medoff D, et al. Self-efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between social support and recovery in serious mental illness. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016;39: 352-360.
  27. Gearing R, De Vylder J, Chen F, et al. Changing perceptions of illness in the early course of psychosis: Psychological pathways to self-determination and self-management of treatment. Psychiatry. 2014;77:344-359.
  28. Farkas M. The vision of recovery today: What it is and what it means for services. World Psychiatry. 2007;6:4-10.
  29. Davidson L, Tondora J, Lawless M, et al. A practical guide to recovery-oriented practice: tools for transforming mental health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  30. Deegan P. The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosoc Rehab J. 1988;11:11-19.
  31. Lloyd-Evans B, Mayo-Wilson E, Harrison B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:39.
  32. Sells D, Davidson L, Jewell C, et al. The treatment relationship in peer-based and regular case management for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:1179-1184.
  33. Sledge W, Lawless M, Sells D, et al. Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions of persons with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:541-544.
  34. Rogers ES, Maru M, Johnson G, et al. Randomized trial of individual peer support for adults with psychiatric disabilities undergoing civil commitment. Psychiatr Rehab J. 2016;39: 248-255.
  35. McGrew J, Bond H. Critical ingredients of assertive community treatment: Judgments of the experts. J Ment Health Adm. 1995;22:113-125.
  36. Bond G, Drake R, Mueser K, et al. Assertive community treat- ment for people with severe mental illness: Critical ingre- dients. And Impact on Clients. Dis Manag Health out. 2001;9:141-159.
  37. Mueser K, Bond G, Drake R, et al. Models of community care for severe mental illness: a review of research on case manage- ment. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24:37-74.
  38. Rosen A, Mueser KT, Teesson M. Assertive community treat- ment-issues from scientific and clinical literature with implica- tions for practice. J Rehab Res Dev. 2007;44:813-826.
  39. Monroe-DeVita M, Teague G, Moser L. The TMACT: A new tool for measuring fidelity to assertive community treatment. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011;17:17-29.
  40. Burns T, Catty J, Dash M, et al. Use of intensive case manage- ment to reduce time in hospital in people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-regression. BMJ. 2007; 335:336.
  41. Hoult J, Reynolds I, Charbonneau-Powis M, et al. Psychiatric hos- pital versus community treatment: The results of a randomised trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1983;17:160-167.
  42. Thornicroft G, Strathdee G, Phelan M, et al. Rationale and design. PRiSM Psychosis Study I. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;173: 363-370.
  43. Thornicroft G, Wykes T, Holloway F, et al. From efficacy to effectiveness in community mental health services. PRiSM Psychosis Study. 10. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;173:423-427.
  44. Nugter M, Engelsbel F, B€ ahler M, et al. Outcomes of Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) implementation: a prospective real life study. Community Ment Health J. 2016;52:898-907.
  45. Williams C, Firn M, Wharne S, et al. Assertive Outreach in Mental Healthcare: Current Perspectives. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
  46. Becker D, Swanson S, Bond G, et al. Evidence-based supported employment fidelity review manual. Dartmouth: Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center. 2008.
  47. Lex en A, Hofgren C, Bejerholm U. Support and process in individual placement and support: a multiple case study. Work. 2013;44:435-448.
  48. Modini M, Tan L, Brinchmann B, et al. Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of the international evidence. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209:14-22.
  49. Kukla M, Bond G. A randomized controlled trial of evidence- based supported employment: nonvocational outcomes. J Vocat Rehab. 2013;38:91-98.
  50. Bond G, Salyers M, Rollins A, et al. How evidence-based practi- ces contribute to community integration. Community Ment Health J. 2004;40:569-588.
  51. Hoffmann H, J€ ackel D, Glauser S, et al. Long-term effectiveness of supported employment: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:1183-1190.
  52. Areberg C, Bj€ orkman T, Bejerholm U. Experiences of the Individual Placement and Support approach in persons with severe mental illness. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27:589-596.
  53. Porter S, Lex en A, Johanson S, et al. Critical factors for the return-to-work process among people with affective disorder: voices from two approaches. Work. 2018;60:221-234.
  54. Topor A, Ljungberg A. Everything is so relaxed and personal - The construction of helpful relationships in individual placement and support. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2016;19:275-293.
  55. Bejerholm U, Larsson M, Johanson S. Supported employment adapted for people with affective disorders-A randomized con- trolled trial. J Affect Disord. 2017;207:212-220.
  56. Hellstr€ om L, Bech P, Hjorthøj C, et al. Effect on return to work or education of Individual Placement and Support modified for people with mood and anxiety disorders: results of a rando- mised clinical trial. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74:717-725.
  57. Reme S, Grasdal A, Løvvik C, et al. Work-focused cognitive- behavioural therapy and individual job support to increase work participation in common mental disorders: a randomised con- trolled multicentre trial. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72:745-752.
  58. Porter S, Bejerholm U. The effect of individual enabling and sup- port on empowerment and depression severity in persons with affective disorders: outcome of a randomized control trial. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72:259-267.
  59. Kessler R, Foster C, Saunders W, et al. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders I: educational attainment. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:1026-1032.
  60. Mueser K, Cook J. Supported employment, supported education, and career development. Psychiatr Rehab J. 2012;35:417-420.
  61. Rudnick A, Gover M. Combining supported education with sup- ported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1690.
  62. Mowbray C, Megivern D, Holter M. Supported education pro- gramming for adults with psychiatric disabilities: results from a national survey. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2003;27:159-167.
  63. Unger K, Pardee R. Outcome measures across program sites for postsecondary supported education programs. Psychiat Rehab J. 2002;25:299-303.
  64. Killackey E, Jackson H, McGorry P. Vocational intervention in first-episode psychosis: A randomised controlled trial of individ- ual placement and support versus treatment as usual. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193:114-120.
  65. Nuechterlein K, Subotnik K, Turner L, et al. Individual placement and support for individuals with recent-onset schizophrenia: Integrating supported education and supported employment. Psychiatr Rehab J. 2008;31:340-349.
  66. Bond G, Drake RE, Luciano A. Employment and educational outcomes in early intervention programmes for early psychosis: a systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015;24:446-457.
  67. Gutman SA, Kerner R, Zombek I, et al. Supported education for adults with psychiatric disabilities: effectiveness of an occupa- tional therapy program. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:245-254.
  68. Chilvers R, Macdonald G, Hayes A. Supported housing of people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;12:1-12.
  69. Newman C, Goldman H. Putting housing first, making housing last: Housing policy for persons with severe mental illness. AJP. 2008;165:1242-1252.
  70. McGuire A, Kukla M, Green A, et al. Illness management and recovery: a review of the literature. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65:171-179.
  71. Mueser K, Corrigan P, Hilton D, et al. Illness management and recovery: a review of the research. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53: 1272-1284.
  72. Lincoln TM, Wilhelm K, Nestoriuc Y. Effectiveness of psychoedu- cation for relapse, symptoms, knowledge, adherence and functioning in psychotic disorders: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2007;96:232-245.
  73. Hogarty GE, Greenwald D, Ulrich RF, et al. Three-year trials of personal therapy among schizophrenic patients living with or independent of family, II: effects on adjustment of patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:1514-1524.
  74. Hogarty G, Kornblith S, Greenwald D, et al. Three-year trials of personal therapy among schizophrenic patients living with or independent of family, I: Description of study and effects on relapse rates. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:1504-1513.
  75. Kopelowicz A, Wallace C, Zarate R. Teaching psychiatric inpa- tients to re-enter the community: a brief method of improving the continuity of care. Psychiatr Serv. 1998;49:1313-1316.
  76. Cook J, Copeland M, Jonikas J, et al. Results of a randomized controlled trial of mental illness self-management using Wellness Recovery Action Planning. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38: 881-891.
  77. Levitt A, Mueser K, DeGenova J, et al. randomized controlled trial of illness management and recovery in multi-unit sup- ported housing. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1629-1636.
  78. Hasson-Ohayon I, Roe D, Kravetz S. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of the illness management and recov- ery program. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:1461-1466.
  79. F€ ardig R, Lewander T, Fredriksson A, et al. Evaluation of the illness management and recovery scale in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Schizophr Res. 2011;132:157-164.
  80. Roe D, Hasson-Ohayon I, Derhi O, et al. Talking about life and finding solutions to different hardships: a qualitative study on the impact of narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy on persons with serious mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198:807-812.
  81. Yanos P, Roe D, West M, et al. Group-based treatment for inter- nalized stigma among persons with severe mental illness: findings from a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Serv. 2012;9:248-258.
  82. Roe D, Hasson-Ohayon I, Mashiach-Eizenberg M, et al. Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy (NECT) effectiveness: a quasi-experimental study. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70:303-312.
  83. Hansson L, Yanos P. Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy a pilot study of outcomes of a self-stigma intervention in a Swedish clinical context. Stigma Health. 2016;1:280-286.
  84. Hansson L, Lex en A, Holm en J. The effectiveness of narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy: a randomized controlled study of a self-stigma intervention. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52:1415-1423.
  85. Slade M, Hayward M. Recovery, psychosis and psychiatry: research is better than rhetoric. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007; 116:81-83.
  86. Campbell-Orde T, Chamberlin J, Carpenter J, et al. Measuring the Promise: A Compendium of Recovery Measures, Volume II. Cambridge, MA: Evaluation Center, HSRI; 2005.
  87. Burgess P, Pirkis J, Coombs T, et al. Assessing the value of exist- ing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45:267-280.
  88. Corrigan P, Giffort D, Rashid F, et al. Recovery as a psychological construct. Community Ment Health J. 1999;35:231-239.
  89. Salyers M, Godfrey J, Mueser K, et al. Measuring illness manage- ment outcomes: a psychometric study of clinician and consumer rating scales for illness self management and recovery. Community Ment Health J. 2007;43:459-480.
  90. Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L. Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40:972-980.
  91. Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L. Development of a short measure of psychological recovery in serious mental illness: the STORI-30. Australas Psychiatry. 2013;21:267-270.
  92. Jerrell J, Cousins V, Roberts K. Psychometrics of the recovery process inventory. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006;33:464-473.
  93. Shanks V, Williams J, Leamy M, et al. Measures of personal recovery: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64:974-980.
  94. Young S, Ensing D. Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Rehab J. 1999;22:219-231.
  95. Young S, Bullock W. The mental health recovery measure. In: Campbell-Orde T, Chamberlin J, Carpenter J, Leff H, editors. Measuring the Promise: A Compendium of Recovery Measures (Vol II-10/2005). Cambridge (MA): The Evaluation Centre@HSRI; 2003.
  96. Chen E, Tam D, Wong J, et al. Self-administered instrument to measure the patient's experience of recovery after first-episode psychosis: development and validation of the Psychosis Recovery Inventory. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39:493-499.
  97. Neil S, Kilbride M, Pitt L, et al. The questionnaire about the pro- cess of recovery (QPR): a measurement tool developed in collab- oration with service users. Psychosis. 2009;1:145-155.
  98. Starnino V, Mariscal S, Holter M, et al. Outcomes of an illness self-management group using wellness recovery action plan- ning. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010;34:57-60.
  99. Dickens G, Weleminsky J, Onifade Y, et al. Recovery star: validat- ing user recovery. Psychiatrist. 2012;36:45-50.
  100. Wolstencroft K, Oades L, Caputi P, et al. Development of a struc- tured interview schedule to assess stage of psychological recov- ery from enduring mental illness. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2010;14:182-189.
  101. Thornicroft G, Slade M. New trends in assessing the outcomes of mental health interventions. World Psychiatry. 2014;13: 118-124.
  102. Sch€ on UK, Svedberg P, Rosenberg D. Evaluating the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in a Swedish psy- chiatric context. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69:275-281.
  103. Bejerholm U, Bj€ orkman T. Empowerment in supported employ- ment research and practice: is it relevant? Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57:588-595.
  104. Johanson S, Bejerholm U. The role of empowerment and quality of life in depression severity among unemployed people with affective disorders receiving mental healthcare. Disab Rehab. 2017;39:1807-1813.
  105. O'Connell M, Tondora J, Croog G, et al. From rhetoric to routine: Assessing perceptions of recovery-oriented practices in a state mental health and addiction system. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2005;28:378-386.
  106. Armstrong N, Steffen J. The recovery promotion fidelity scale: assessing the organizational promotion of recovery. Community Ment Health J. 2009;45:163-170.
  107. Anthony W, Rogers E, Farkas M. Research on evidence-based practices: future directions in an era of recovery. Commun Ment Health J. 2003;39:101-114.
  108. Resnick S, Fontana A, Lehman A, et al. An empirical conceptual- ization of the recovery orientation. Schizophr Res. 2005; 75:119-128.
  109. Angermeyer M, Holzinger A, Matschinger H, et al. Depression and quality of life: results of a follow-up study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2002;48:189-199.
  110. Kuehner C, Buerger C. Determinants of subjective quality of life in depressed patients: the role of self-esteem, response styles, and social support. J Affect Disord. 2005;86:205-213.
  111. Bech P, Austin SF, Lau ME. Patient reported outcome measures [PROMs): examination of the psychometric properties of two measures for burden of symptoms and quality of life in patients with depression or anxiety. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72:251-258.
  112. Keetharuth A, Brazier J, Connell J, et al. Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;212:42-49.
  113. Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L. Do clinical outcome measures assess consumer-defined recovery? Psychiatry Res. 2010;177: 309-317.
  114. Roe D, Drake R, Slade M. Routine outcome monitoring: An inter- national endeavour. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27:257-260.
  115. Roe D, Gelkopf M, Gornemann M, et al. Implementing routine outcome measurement in psychiatric rehabilitation services in Israel. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27:345-353.
  116. Shadmi E, Gelkopf M, Garber Epstein P, et al. Routine patient reported outcomes as predictors of psychiatric rehospitalization. Schizophr Res. 2018;192:119-123.
  117. Topor A, Bøe T, Larsen I. Small things, micro-affirmations and helpful professionals everyday recovery-orientated practices according to persons with mental health problems. Commun Ment Health J. 2018. DOI:10.1007/s10597-018-0245-9 · DOI
  118. Bergmark M, Bejerholm U, Markstr€ om U. Critical components in implementing evidence-based practice: a multiple case study of individual placement and support for people with psychiatric disabilities. Soc Policy Adm. 2018;52:790-808.
  119. Kelly J, Gallagher S, McMahon J. Developing and recovery col- lege: a preliminary exercise in establishing regional readiness and community needs. J Mental Health. 2017;26:150-155.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bejerholm, U., & Roe, D.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
Bejerholm, Ulrika
ORCID
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2018-08-18
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
420-430
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
DOI
10.1080/08039488.2018.1492015
OpenAlex
W2898907663
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
personal recovery, positive psychiatry, recovery-oriented services, mental illness, well-being, peer support, assertive community treatment, supported employment, supported education, supported housing, illness self-management, self-stigma, recovery strategies, meaning in life, quality of life
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Counseling, Delivery of Health Care, Health Status, Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychiatry, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review