Cited by 138Disability Education and EmploymentSchizophrenia research and treatmentEmployment and Welfare Studies

Individual placement and support in Sweden—A randomized controlled trial

Bejerholm, Ulrika, Areberg, Cecilia, Hofgren, Caisa, Sandlund, Mikael, Rinaldi, Miles·2015·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently there is no evidence on the effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) in Sweden. AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of IPS on vocational outcomes among people with severe mental illness (SMI) in a Swedish context. A secondary aim was to evaluate a community integration effect. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was used. Mental health outpatients with SMI were randomized to IPS or traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR) services. The allocation status was assessor-blinded. The primary outcome was competitive employment. All vocational outcomes were collected continuously, and socio-demographic and clinical variables at baseline, 6 and 18 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00960024. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty participants were randomized. Eighty seven per cent were assessed after 6 months, and 73% after 18 months. IPS was more effective than TVR in terms of gaining employment at 18-month follow-up (46% vs. 11%; difference 36%, 95% CI 18-54), along with the amount of working hours and weeks, longer job tenure periods and income. Cox regression analysis showed that IPS participants gained employment five times quicker than those in TVR. Ninety per cent of the IPS participants became involved in work, internships or education, i.e. activities integrated in mainstream community settings, while 24% in the TVR group achieved this. CONCLUSIONS: IPS is effective in a Swedish context in terms of gaining employment and becoming integrated within the local community. The welfare system presented obstacles for gaining competitive employment directly and it was indicated that internships delayed time to first competitive employment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/08039488.2014.929739

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interventions included staff training about activity engagement, Individual Placement and Support (IPS), cognitive remediation, Social Recovery Therapy (SRT), a befriending program, lifestyle modification and occupational therapy group programs.

    “These interventions included staff training about activity engagement, its importance for addressing mental illness and approaches to encourage engagement (49); Individual Placement and Support (IPS) (45, 48); cognitive remediation (50); Social Recovery Therapy (SRT) (based on cognitive behavioral strategies) (52–54); a befriending program (56); lifestyle modification (51) and occupational therapy”
  • POES has been used to measure activity engagement and community inclusion outcomes of IPS programs for people experiencing severe mental illness, with significant improvements reported with more engagement in a range of activities and community contexts.

    “POES has been used to measure activity engagement and community inclusion outcomes of IPS programs for people experiencing severe mental illness (45, 48), with significant improvements reported with more engagement in a range of activities and community contexts.”
  • POES focuses on activities as defined by people with severe mental illness themselves and is more able to evaluate a range of health and well-being aspects of activity engagement that are sensitive to the influence of complex factors like capacities, experiences, and the course of recovery.

    “An alternative approach to time use assessment, such as the POES (36), focuses on activities as defined by people with severe mental illness themselves and is more able to evaluate a range of health and well-being aspects of activity engagement that are sensitive to the influence of complex factors like capacities, experiences, and the course of recovery (36, 37, 48, 51).”
  • The demographic profile of this present study is similar to other IPS studies in that it does not represent the SMI population.

    “The demographic profile of this present study is similar to other IPS studies [63, 72–76] in that it does not represent the SMI population.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bejerholm, U., Areberg, C., Hofgren, C., Sandlund, M., & Rinaldi, M.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Bejerholm, Ulrika
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-07
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
57-66
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W1970238684
Cited by
138
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
33.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Individual Placement and Support, severe mental illness, vocational rehabilitation, competitive employment, social reintegration, employment effects, internships, job tenure, income, Sweden
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Single-Blind Method, Employment, Supported, Young Adult, Community Integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review