The intersection of turn-taking and repair: the timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation
Open accessAbstract
The transitions between turns at talk in conversation tend to occur quickly, with only a slight gap of ∼100-300 ms between them. This estimate of central tendency, however, hides a wealth of complex variation, as a number of factors, such as the type of turns involved, have been shown to influence the timing of turn transitions. This article considers one specific type of turn that does not conform to the statistical trend, namely turns that deal with troubles of speaking, hearing, and understanding, known as other-initiations of repair (OIR). The results of a quantitative analysis of 169 OIRs in face-to-face conversation reveal that the most frequent cases occur after gaps of ∼700 ms. Furthermore, OIRs that locate a source of trouble in a prior turn specifically tend to occur after shorter gaps than those that do not, and those that correct errors in a prior turn, while rare, tend to occur without delay. An analysis of the transitions before OIRs, using methods of conversation analysis, suggests that speakers use the extra time (i) to search for a late recognition of the problematic turn, (ii) to provide an opportunity for the speaker of the problematic turn to resolve the trouble independently, and (iii) to produce visual signals, such as facial gestures. In light of these results, it is argued that OIRs take priority over other turns at talk in conversation and therefore are not subject to the same rules and constraints that motivate fast turn transitions in general.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Severe dysarthria can mean that attempts to resolve trouble sources are likely to become trouble sources in their own right, causing cascading troubles.
“Severe dysarthria can therefore mean that attempts to resolve trouble sources are likely to become trouble sources in their own right, causing 'cascading troubles' (see Kendrick, 2015, p. 167).”
From Dysarthria and other-initiated repair in everyday conversation (2020) · cites this paper as Kendrick, 2015
The Results section (page not available in our copy) describes a case in which an other-initiation of repair is itself identified as a trouble source, supporting that part of the claim. The paper does not connect this possibility to severe dysarthria or describe it as a likely cascade of troubles; searches for “dysarthria” and “cascading troubles” found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413107 · Cited by 5,150 · see citing works
The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update
Indefrey, P. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255 · Cited by 767 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Given that experimental research has shown that speakers need at least 600 ms to plan even a simple word (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011), processes of language production in conversation must begin well before the current turn ends (Levinson, 2013).”
BackgroundEarly Anticipation Lies behind the Speed of Response in Conversation
Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., de Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00673 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Prediction of Turn-Ends Based on Anticipation of Upcoming Words
Magyari, L., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00376 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking
Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008 · Cited by 85 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Psycholinguists have thus begun to investigate the cognitive processes that enable the minimization of gaps between turns (Magyari and de Ruiter, 2012; Magyari et al., 2014; Sjerps and Meyer, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 60
- Benjamin T. (2012). When problems pass us by: using ‘You Mean’ to help locate the source of trouble. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 45 82– 109 10.1080/08351813.2012.646742 · DOI
- Benjamin T. (2013). Signaling Trouble: On the Linguistic Design of Other-Initiation of Repair in English Conversation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Benjamin T. Walker T. (2013). Managing problems of acceptability through high rise-fall repetitions. Discourse Process. 50 107– 138 10.1080/0163853X.2012.739143 · DOI
- Bolden G. B. (2009). “Implementing delayed actions,” in Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives ed. Sidnell J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 326– 353 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.012 · DOI
- Bolden G. B. Mandelbaum J. Wilkinson S. (2012). Pursuing a response by repairing an indexical reference. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 45 137– 155 10.1080/08351813.2012.673380 · DOI
- Bosch L.-T. Oostdijk N. Boves L. (2005). On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Commun. 47 80– 86 10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.009 · DOI
- Clark H. H. Schaefer E. F. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Lang. Cogn. Process. 2 19– 41 10.1080/01690968708406350 · DOI
- Doherty-Sneddon G. Phelps F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: a response to cognitive or social difficulty? Mem. Cogn. 33 727– 733 10.3758/BF03195338 16248336 · DOI
- Drew P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. J. Pragmat. 28 69– 101 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7 · DOI
- Egbert M. Golato A. Robinson J. D. (2009). “Repairing reference,” in Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives ed. Sidnell J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 104– 132 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.005 · DOI
- Floyd S. Manrique E. Rossi G. Torreira F. (in press). The timing of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: evidence from three languages. Discourse Process. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.992680 · DOI
- Ford C. E. Thompson S. A. (1996). “Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns,” in Interaction and Grammar eds Ochs E. Schegloff E. A. Thompson S. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 134– 184.
- Glenberg A. M. Schroeder J. L. Robertson D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Mem. Cogn. 26 651– 658 10.3758/BF03211385 9701957 · DOI
- Goodwin C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning.Sociol. Inq. 50 272– 302 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x · DOI
- Goodwin C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
- Heath C. (1984). “Talk and recipiency: sequential organization in speech and body movement,” in Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, eds Atkinson J. M. Heritage J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 247– 265.
- Heldner M. Edlund J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations.J. Phon. 38 555– 568 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Heritage J. (1984). “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement,” in Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis eds Atkinson J. M. Heritage J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 299– 345.
- Heritage J. (2012). Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 45 1– 29 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 · DOI
- Holler J. Kendrick K. H. (2015). Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: optimizing recipiency. Front. Lang. Sci. 6: 98 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00098 PMC4321333 25709592 · DOI
- Hothorn T. Hornik K. van de Wiel M. A. and Zeileis A. (2006). A Lego system for conditional inference. Am. Stat. 60 257– 263 10.1198/000313006X118430 · DOI
- Indefrey P. Levelt W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92 101– 144 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 15037128 · DOI · Paper page
- Jefferson G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9 47– 96 10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47 · DOI
- Jefferson G. (1986). Notes on ‘Latency’ in overlap onset. Hum. Stud. 9 153– 183 10.1007/BF00148125 · DOI
- Kendrick K. H. (in press) Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguist. 1 164– 190 10.2478/opli-2014-0009 · DOI
- Kendrick K. H. Torreira F. (2012). The timing and construction of preference: a quantitative study. Paper presented at the Discourse, Communication, and Conversation Conference, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
- Kendrick K. H. Torreira F. (2014). The timing and construction of preference: a quantitative study. Discourse Process. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997 · DOI
- Kitzinger C. (2013). “Repair,” in The Handbook of Conversation Analysis eds Sidnell J. Stivers T. (Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd) 229– 256 10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997 · DOI
- Labov W. Fanshel D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
- Lerner G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: the context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Lang. Soc. 32 177– 201 10.1017/S004740450332202X · DOI
- Levinson S. C.(2013). “Action formation and ascription,” in The Handbook of Conversation Analysis eds Sidnell J. Stivers T. (Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell Publishing Ltd) 101– 130.
- Li X. (2014). Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation. J. Pragmat. 67 34– 60 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011 · DOI
- Local J. Walker G. (2004). Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. J. Pragmat. 36 1375– 1403 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.04.006 · DOI
- Markson L. Paterson K. B. (2009). Effects of Gaze-aversion on visual-spatial imagination. Br. J. Psychol. 100 553– 563 10.1348/000712608X371762 19021925 · DOI
- Mondada L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Stud. 8 117– 129 10.1177/1461445606059561 · DOI
- Mondada L. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Stud. 9 194– 225 10.1177/1461445607075346 · DOI
- Pomerantz A. (1984). “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes,” in Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis eds Atkinson J. M. Heritage J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 57– 101.
- Rasmussen G. (2013). Inclined to better understanding—the coordination of talk and ‘leaning forward’ in doing repair. J. Pragmat. 65 30– 45 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.001 · DOI
- Roberts F. Francis A. L. (2013). Identifying a temporal threshold of tolerance for silent gaps after requests. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133 EL471– EL477 10.1121/1.4802900 23742442 · DOI
- Roberts F. Robinson J. D. (2004). Interobserver agreement on first-stage conversation analytic transcription. Hum. Commun. Res. 30 376– 410 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00737.x · DOI
- Robinson J. D. (2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Commun. Monogr. 73 137– 161 10.1080/03637750600581206 · DOI
- Robinson J. D. (2014). What ‘What?’ tells us about how conversationalists manage intersubjectivity. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 47 109– 129 10.1080/08351813.2014.900214 · DOI · Paper page
- Robinson J. Kevoe-Feldman K. (2010). Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 43 232– 259 10.1080/08351813.2010.497990 · DOI
- Rossano F. (2006). When the eyes meet: using gaze to mobilize response. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Helsinki.
- Rossano F. (2012). Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
- Schegloff E. A. (1988). On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: a single case conjecture. Soc. Probl. 35 442– 457 10.2307/800596 · DOI
- Schegloff E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. Am. J. Soc. 97 1295– 1345 10.1086/229903 · DOI · Paper page
- Schegloff E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Process. 23 499– 545 10.1080/01638539709545001 · DOI
- Schegloff E. A. (2000). When ‘Others’ initiate repair. Appl. Linguist. 21 205– 243 10.1093/applin/21.2.205 · DOI · Paper page
- Schegloff E. A. (2006). “Interaction: the infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is situated,” in Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction eds Enfield N. J. Levinson S. C. (Oxford: Berg Publishers) 70– 96.
- Schegloff E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511791208 · DOI
- Selting M. (1988). The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation. J. Pragmat. 12 293– 322 10.1016/0378-2166(88)90035-5 · DOI
- Seo M.-S. Koshik I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. J. Pragmat. 42 2219– 2239 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021 · DOI
- Stivers T. Enfielda N. J. Browna P. Englertb C. Hayashic M. Heinemann T. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 10587– 10592 10.1073/pnas.0903616106 19553212 PMC2705608 · DOI · Paper page
- Stivers T. Rossano F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 43 3– 31 10.1080/08351810903471258 · DOI
- Strömbergsson S. Hjalmarsson A. Edlund J. House D. (2013). “Timing responses to question S in dialogue,” in Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (Lyon: International Speech Communication Association) 2584– 2588.
- Svennevig J. (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. J. Pragmat. 40 333– 348 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007 · DOI
- Wilkinson S. Kitzinger C.(2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: reaction tokens in conversation. Soc. Psychol. Q. 69 150– 182 10.1177/019027250606900203 · DOI
- Wilson T. Zimmerman D. (1986). The structure of silence between turns in two-party conversation. Discourse Process. 9 375– 390 10.1080/01638538609544649 · DOI
- Wong J. (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Appl. Linguist. 21 244– 267 10.1093/applin/21.2.244 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early Anticipation Lies behind the Speed of Response in Conversation
Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., de Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00673 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Speech Planning at Turn Transitions in Dialog Is Associated With Increased Processing Load
Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12768 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Competition Reduces Response Times in Multiparty Conversation
Holler, J., Alday, P. M., Decuyper, C., Geiger, M., Kendrick, K. H., & Meyer, A. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693124 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationDysarthria and other-initiated repair in everyday conversation
Bloch, S., & Barnes, S. (2020) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2019.1705915 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Embodied-Visual Practices during Conversational Repair: Scoping Review
Saalasti, S., Pajo, K., Fox, B., Pekkala, S., & Laakso, M. (2023) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2023.2272528 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kendrick, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kendrick, Kobin H.
- ORCID
- Kendrick, Kobin H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 250-250
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4357221
- OpenAlex
- W2063271655
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 46.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Max Planck Instituut voor Psycholinguïstiek
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- turn-taking, repair, turn transitions, face-to-face communication, speech errors, facial gestures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review