The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Current reporting of intervention content in published research articles and protocols is generally poor, with great diversity of terminology, resulting in low replicability. This study aimed to extend the scope and improve the reliability of a 26-item taxonomy of behaviour change techniques developed by Abraham and Michie [Abraham, C. and Michie, S. (2008). A taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology, 27(3), 379-387.] in order to optimise the reporting and scientific study of behaviour change interventions. METHODS: Three UK study centres collaborated in applying this existing taxonomy to two systematic reviews of interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating. The taxonomy was refined in iterative steps of (1) coding intervention descriptions, and assessing inter-rater reliability, (2) identifying gaps and problems across study centres and (3) refining the labels and definitions based on consensus discussions. RESULTS: Labels and definitions were improved for all techniques, conceptual overlap between categories was resolved, some categories were split and 14 techniques were added, resulting in a 40-item taxonomy. Inter-rater reliability, assessed on 50 published intervention descriptions, was good (kappa = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: This taxonomy can be used to improve the specification of interventions in published reports, thus improving replication, implementation and evidence syntheses. This will strengthen the scientific study of behaviour change and intervention development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This incorporation of evidence-based behavior change techniques, such as goal setting, action planning, and problem-solving, is associated with improved weight loss outcomes [47].”
From Impact of Digital Engagement on Weight Loss Outcomes in Obesity Management Among Individuals Using GLP-1 and Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonist Therapy: Retrospective Cohort Service Evaluation Study (2025) · cites this paper as [47]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“All studies included some form of behavioral change techniques ranging from basic techniques such as the provision of feedback and goal setting to interventions based on the Coventry, Aberdeen and London-Refined taxonomy [55], social cognitive theory [56], and social determination theory [57].”
From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“BCTTv1 incorporated a number of cross-behaviour BCT taxonomies [25, 26] and some behaviour-specific taxonomies for physical activity [27], alcohol use [28], smoking [29] and condom use [30].”
In the citing paper
“The design of MAX was driven by an interdisciplinary effort that resulted in a conceptual model with intervention components informed by human behavior and experiential learning theories [61,65,66], findings from technology acceptance research [49,51,58,102], and prior experiences of the authors with conversational agents that support health care professionals and young adolescent patients [67,68]”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,666
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655 · Cited by 10,995 · cited 2×
“This is not straightforward, as interventions to change health-related behaviours are usually complex, comprising many, often interacting components (Craig et al., 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPractical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Human agency in social cognitive theory.
Bandura, A. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175 · Cited by 8,263
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Bartko, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290246 · Cited by 4,834
On the Self-Regulation of Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174794 · Cited by 4,110
A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions
Abraham, C., & Michie, S. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379 · Cited by 2,525
Self-citationEffective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression.
Michie, S., Abraham, C., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., & Gupta, S. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016136 · Cited by 2,229
Self-citationMichie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Eccles, M. (2008) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x · Cited by 1,789
Self-citationAvenell, A., Broom, J., Brown, T., Poobalan, A., Aucott, L., Stearns, S., Smith, W., Jung, R., Campbell, M., & Grant, A. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8210 · Cited by 1,041 · cited 2×
“Systematic reviews of the effects of physical activity and healthy eating interventions on behaviour or health outcomes often conclude that both the interventions as well as the effect sizes are extremely heterogeneous (Avenell et al., 2004; Lemmens, Oenema, Klepp, Henriksen, & Brug, 2008; Ogilvie et al., 2007).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Michie S, 2009, Psychology and Health, 24, S1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
Gilinsky, A., Hughes, A., & McInnes, R. (2012) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-112 · Cited by 9
Lewis, Z. H., Ottenbacher, K. J., Fisher, S. R., Jennings, K., Brown, A. F., Swartz, M. C., & Lyons, E. (2016) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.5454 · Cited by 9
Chandrasekaran, B., Kundapur, P. P., & Rao, C. R. (2021) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab042 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Michie, S., Ashford, S., Sniehotta, F. F., Dombrowski, S. U., Bishop, A., & French, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Coventry University (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Michie, Susan
- Venue
- Psychology & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1479-1498
- ISSN
- 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8321
- OpenAlex
- W2013620493
- Cited by
- 1,756
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 162 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 88.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (G0900686)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007470/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- behaviour change techniques, physical activity interventions, healthy eating interventions, inter-rater reliability, intervention replication
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Therapy, Feeding Behavior, United Kingdom, Humans, Exercise, Risk Reduction Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
