Cited by 98Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The effects of mindfulness interventions on prenatal well-being: A systematic review

Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Lee, Laura, Murphy, Gillian, Murphy, Lisa·2016·Psychology & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low well-being during pregnancy can have significant adverse outcomes for mother and child. The effects of mindfulness interventions on prenatal maternal well-being are increasingly examined but outcomes have yet to be systematically evaluated. The aims of the current paper are to systematically evaluate intervention effects and current research approaches with pregnant groups. DESIGN: A systematic review of eight studies examining mindfulness intervention effects on prenatal well-being. RESULTS: Findings indicate potential benefits of mindfulness interventions for reducing levels of depression, anxiety and negative affect during pregnancy. There is also evidence for improved self-compassion and perceived childbirth self-efficacy. Further, these effects may be more pronounced for vulnerable groups, such as women currently experiencing low prenatal well-being. Less consistent findings were observed for stress, and positive affect. Variations in research design, gestational characteristics, timing of assessments and outcome measurement may explain some inconsistencies in the extant literature. CONCLUSION: Mindfulness interventions present a potentially useful means to improve prenatal well-being but improved methodological quality is essential to rigorously examine intervention effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2016.1220557

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matvienko-Sikar, K., Lee, L., Murphy, G., & Murphy, L.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2016-08-18
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
1415-1434
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2507666147
Cited by
98
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, pregnancy, maternal depression, anxiety, negative affect, self-compassion, childbirth self-efficacy, stress, positive affect, vulnerable pregnant women
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review