Cited by 71Writing and Handwriting EducationDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Countable indices of writing quality: Their suitability for screening‐eligibility decisions

Parker, Richard, Tindal, Gerald, Hasbrouck, Jan·1991·Exceptionality

Abstract

We examined five countable indices of writing quality for suitability in making special education screening‐eligibility decisions, collecting writing samples for 2,160 students in Grades 2 to 11 from two school districts. We examined the sensitivity of the writing indices around potential screening cutoff points on histograms and percentile line graphs with 68% standard error bands. In addition, we assessed criterion validity within each grade level by correlating the writing indices with teachers' holistic judgments of writing quality. Of the five indices, the percentage of words spelled correctly in a 3‐minute writing sample showed greatest measurement sensitivity for screening applications. If Grade 2 were excluded, the percentage of correct word sequences could be recommended as an alternative scoring method. Large standard errors of measurement, however, indicated the need for caution in interpreting score differences. Because we could not reliably differentiate scores 30 to 40 percentile points apart, grouping students from screening results may result in an unacceptable number of false‐positives and false‐negatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09362839109524763

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, R., Tindal, G., & Hasbrouck, J.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Exceptionality
Published
1991-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 0936-2835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7035
OpenAlex
W2019284651
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Exceptionality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
writing quality, spelling accuracy, criterion validity, standard error of measurement, false positives and false negatives, writing samples, students with disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review