Cited by 11Writing and Handwriting EducationBehavioral and Psychological StudiesReading and Literacy Development

Curriculum-Based Measures of Writing for High School Students

Diercks-Gransee, Barbara, Weissenburger, Jacalyn Wright, Johnson, Cindy L., Christensen, Paul·2009·Remedial and Special Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether technically adequate curriculum-based measures of writing could be identified for use with high school students. The participants included 10th-grade general and special education students from two public school districts in Wisconsin. Students ( n = 82) completed two narrative writing samples in response to story starters, and samples were scored for four alternative curriculum-based measures: incorrect word sequences (ICWS), correct punctuation marks (CPM), adverbs (ADV), and adjectives (ADJ). Results revealed moderately strong alternate-form reliability and criterion-related validity coefficients for ICWS. Although CPM was found to be reliable, the criterion-related validity evidence varied according to the type of criterion measure. Other findings indicated that ICWS and CPM cut scores may have utility for specific screening purposes. The curriculum-based measures of ADJ and ADV, however, were not found to have the technical adequacy needed for predictive purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0741932508324398

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Diercks-Gransee, B., Weissenburger, J. W., Johnson, C. L., & Christensen, P.
Affiliations
  • Iowa Academy of Science (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Stout (US)
  • Memorial High School, Eau Claire, Wisconsin
  • Mahtomedi High School, Mahtomedi, Minnesota
Corresponding author
Weissenburger, Jacalyn Wright
Venue
Remedial and Special Education
Published
2008-09-23
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
360-371
ISSN
  • 0741-9325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4756
OpenAlex
W2137493210
Cited by
11
References
34
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Remedial and Special Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
curriculum-based measurement, writing assessment, high school students, narrative writing, punctuation, adverbs, adjectives, alternate form reliability, criterion validity, screening, special education students, general education students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review