Cited by 62Writing and Handwriting EducationBehavioral and Psychological StudiesEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

Curriculum-based measures of writing across grade levels

Weissenburger, Jacalyn Wright, Espin, Christine A.·2005·Journal of School Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.03.002

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weissenburger, J. W., & Espin, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Stout (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Weissenburger, Jacalyn Wright
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
153-169
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061376117
Cited by
62
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Keywords
curriculum-based measurement, written expression, narrative writing, grade level differences, alternate form reliability, criterion validity, technical adequacy, writing assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review