The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affordance analysis – matching learning tasks with learning technologies
Abstract
This article presents a design methodology for matching learning tasks with learning technologies. First a working definition of “affordances” is provided based on the need to describe the action potentials of the technologies (utility). Categories of affordances are then proposed to provide a framework for analysis. Following this, a methodology for designing e‐learning experiences by matching the affordance requirements of tasks with the affordances offered by the available technologies is described. Rather than being prescriptive, the methodology is designed to be adjustable, expandable, and applied to various degrees of rigor depending on the context. An example application of the methodology is provided for illustrative purposes. Une analyse des capacités – Faire correspondre les tâches d’apprentissage avec les technologies d’apprentissage Cet article présente une méthodologie de conception permettant la mise en phase des tâches d’apprentissage avec les technologies d’apprentissage. On fournit tout d’abord une définition opérationnelle des « capacités », définition fondée sur la nécessité de décrire le potentiel actif des technologies (utilité). On propose ensuite des catégories de capacités afin d’offrir un cadre d’analyse. A la suite on présente une méthodologie d’élaboration des expériences de e‐learning en faisant correspondre les besoins en capacités de chaque tâche avec les capacités offertes par chaque technologie. Cette méthodologie n’est pas prescriptive mais elle est plutôt conçue pour être modifiable, extensible et appliquée aux divers degrés de rigueur en fonction du contexte. A titre d’illustration, on fournit un exemple d’application de cette méthodologie. Affordanz‐Analyse – die richtige Lerntechnologie passend zur Lernaufgabe In diesem Artikel wird eine Entwurfsmethode vorgestellt, um Lerntechnologien passend zur Lernaufgabe auszuwählen. Zunächst wird eine Arbeitsdefinition von “Affordanz” (Nutzungsangebot einer Technologie) vorgestellt, die vom Bedarf einer Beschreibung von Aktionspotenzialen der Technologien ausgeht (Nützlichkeit). Kategorien von Affordanz werden dann vorgeschlagen, um einen Rahmen für die Analyse zu liefern. Dieser Richtung folgend wird eine Methodologie zur Gestaltung von Erfahrungen beim e‐Learning vorgeschlagen, die zur Übereinstimmung der Anforderungen an die Affordanz von Aufgaben mit der Affordanz angebotener Technologien führen. Diese Methodologie ist nicht präskriptiv, sondern anpassungsfähig und ausdehnbar, außerdem anwendbar auf verschiedene Starrheitsgrade in Abhängigkeit vom Kontext. Eine Beispielanwendung soll diese Methodologie illustrieren. Un análisis de capacidades – La sintonización de las tareas de aprendizaje con las tecnologías de aprendizaje El presente artículo presenta una metodología de diseño para sintonizar las tareas de aprendizaje con las tecnologías de aprendizaje. En primero lugar se facilita una definición operacional de las « capacidades » basada en la necesidad de ofrecer una descripción de los potenciales operacionales de las tecnologías (utilidad). En segundo lugar presentamos algunas categorias de capacidades para armar un marco de análisis. A continuación se describe una metodología para diseñar experiencias de e‐learning basada en la sintonización de las capacidades que requieren las diversas tareas con las capacidades propias de las tecnologías disponibles. En su diseño, esa metodología no es prescriptiva sino más bien adaptable, expandible y aplicable a diversos grados de rigor en función del contexto. Para ilustrar eso se facilita un ejemplo de aplicación.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Affordance, conventions, and design
Norman, D. A. (1999) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/301153.301168 · Cited by 2,040
Cited by
What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments?
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x · Cited by 1,840
Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002 · Cited by 1,210
Lui, A. L. C., Not, C., & Wong, G. K. W. (2023) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10035-2 · Cited by 44
Developing a natural language-based AI-chatbot for social work training: an illustrative case study
Chan, C., & Li, F. (2023) · China Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/17525098.2023.2176901 · Cited by 27
Grant, C., Gephart, S. M., & Rattray, N. (2024) · Nursing for Women's Health · doi:10.1016/j.nwh.2024.02.006 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bower, M.
- Venue
- Educational Media International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-15
- ISSN
- 0952-3987 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5790
- OpenAlex
- W2053563199
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.