Cited by 28AI in Service InteractionsSpeech and dialogue systemsArtificial Intelligence in Education

Developing a natural language-based AI-chatbot for social work training: an illustrative case study

Open access
Chan, Chitat, Li, Feng·2023·China Journal of Social Work

Abstract

A chatbot is a computer program designed to simulate conversation with human users. In social services, many chatbots are retrieval based: they analyse users’ intents and retrieve preset answers based on decision tree logic. A major limitation of these earlier chatbots was that their conversations were rigid, unnatural, and sounded like a multiple-choice questionnaire. Recent achievements in large-scale generative pretrained transformers (LGPTs) (e.g. GPT-3, Yuan 1.0) have offered new possibilities for chatbot development. Such technology provides a high-quality natural language experience, requires much less resource input than earlier chatbot technologies, and is much more accessible to the public. However, the use of LGPT-based cfhatbots in social work, particularly in a Chinese context, is uncommon or even absent. Using an illustrative case study, this article illustrates the initial development of an LGPT-based chatbot to support social work training in a Chinese context and discusses the possibilities for further development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17525098.2023.2176901

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chatbots can maintain therapeutic conversations.

    “maintain therapeutic conversations [14]”
  • Compared with human psychiatrists, the chatbot displayed more empathy and asked more thorough questions about some symptoms (eg, sleep), but was less likely to rule out associated conditions.

    “Compared with human psychiatrists, the chatbot displayed more empathy and asked more thorough questions about some symptoms (eg, sleep), but was less likely to rule out associated conditions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, C., & Li, F.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Inspur (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Chan, Chitat
Venue
China Journal of Social Work
Published
2023-03-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
121-136
ISSN
  • 1752-5098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-5101
OpenAlex
W4323316263
Cited by
27
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
China Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
chatbots, large language models, generative pre-trained transformer, social work training, natural language interaction, Chinese context, chatbot development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review