Cited by 44Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAugmented Reality ApplicationsEducation and Learning Interventions

Theory-Based Learning Design with Immersive Virtual Reality in Science Education: A Systematic Review

Lui, Angela L. C., Not, Christelle, Wong, Gary K. W.·2023·Journal of Science Education and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10956-023-10035-2

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 126 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lui, A. L. C., Not, C., & Wong, G. K. W.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Wong, Gary K. W.
Venue
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Published
2023-03-31
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
390-432
ISSN
  • 1059-0145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1839
OpenAlex
W4362475674
Cited by
44
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Science Education and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Education and Learning Interventions
Keywords
immersive virtual reality, learning theory, science education, lesson design, design principles, learner control, cognitive load, learner characteristics, reflective tasks, learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review