Cited by 83Innovations in Medical EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessCompetency Development and Evaluation

How competent are non-specialists trained to integrate mental health services in primary care? Global health perspectives from Uganda, Liberia, and Nepal

Open access
Kohrt, Brandon A., Mutamba, Byamah B., Luitel, Nagendra P., Gwaikolo, Wilfred, Onyango Mangen, Patrick, Nakku, Juliet, Rose, Kisa, Cooper, Janice +2 more·2018·International Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Evaluations to objectively assess minimum competency are not routinely implemented for training and supervision in global mental health. Addressing this gap in competency assessment is crucial for safe and effective mental health service integration in primary care. To explore competency, this study describes a training and supervision program for 206 health workers in Uganda, Liberia, and Nepal in humanitarian settings impacted by political violence, Ebola, and natural disasters. Health workers were trained in the World Health Organization's mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). Health workers demonstrated changes in knowledge (mhGAP knowledge, effect size, d = 1.14), stigma (Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes, d = -0.64; Social Distance Scale, d = -0.31), and competence (ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors, ENACT, d = 1.68). However, health workers were only competent in 65% of skills. Although the majority were competent in communication skills and empathy, they were not competent in assessing physical and mental health, addressing confidentiality, involving family members in care, and assessing suicide risk. Higher competency was associated with lower stigma (social distance), but competency was not associated with knowledge. To promote competency, this study recommends (1) structured role-plays as a standard evaluation practice; (2) standardized reporting of competency, knowledge, attitudes, and clinical outcomes; and (3) shifting the field toward competency-based approaches to training and supervision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540261.2019.1566116

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ENACT tool was created to assess mental health and psychosocial support skills through role plays, for both specialist and non-specialist providers, across different cultures, contexts, and intervention types.

    “EQUIP will encompass a competency evaluation tool, the Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (ENACT), that has been developed for role-play based assessment of mental health and psychosocial support skills for non-specialist and specialist providers across cultures, context and types of interventions 8,9 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organization. (2016). mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings: mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) – version 2.0. World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland: W. Press. http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/mhGAP_intervention_guide_02/en/ 27786430

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohrt, B. A., Mutamba, B. B., Luitel, N. P., Gwaikolo, W., Onyango Mangen, P., Nakku, J., Rose, K., Cooper, J., Jordans, M. J. D., & Baingana, F.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Butabika Hospital (UG)
  • Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal;
  • The Carter Center Mental Health Program, Monrovia, Liberia;
  • Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Uganda, Kampala, Uganda;
  • Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda;
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Makerere University (UG)
Corresponding author
Kohrt, Brandon A.
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2018-11-02
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
182-198
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
OpenAlex
W2915488841
Cited by
83
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • Makerere University School of Public Health (#GMH_, -04)
  • U.S. National Institute of Mental Health (10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
mental health integration, primary care, competency assessment, non-specialist mental health workers, Mental Health Gap Action Programme, training and supervision, stigma, social distance, humanitarian settings, political violence, Ebola, natural disasters, competency-based training, role play, suicide risk assessment, confidentiality, Uganda, Liberia, Nepal
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Clinical Competence, Community Mental Health Services, Developing Countries, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Liberia, Male, Nepal, Primary Health Care, Uganda, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review