Cited by 584Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesGlobal Health and Surgery

PRIME: A Programme to Reduce the Treatment Gap for Mental Disorders in Five Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Open access
Lund, Crick, Tomlinson, Mark, De Silva, Mary, Fekadu, Abebaw, Shidhaye, Rahul, Jordans, Mark, Petersen, Inge, Bhana, Arvin +13 more·2012·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

CITATION: Lund, C., et al. 2012. PRIME : a programme to reduce the treatment gap for mental disorders in five low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Medicine, 9(12): 1-6, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001359.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001359

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large multicountry initiatives including PRIME and EMERALD have demonstrated the clinical feasibility and acceptability of integrating mental health into routine primary care platforms.

    “Large multicountry initiatives, including the Programme for Improving Mental Health Care (PRIME) and the Emerging Mental Health Systems in LMICs (EMERALD) programme, have demonstrated the clinical feasibility and acceptability of integrating mental health into routine primary care platforms (Lund et al. 2012, Semrau et al. 2015).”

    From Government-led scale-up of task-shifted mental health services in Lagos State, Nigeria: a mixed-methods descriptive-explanatory case study (2026) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2012

    The Summary Points identify PRIME as a five-country initiative integrating mental health into primary care. But the Aims and Objectives section says PRIME *will evaluate* the feasibility and acceptability of its care packages; it does not report that these had already been demonstrated. The Background also says evidence on delivery in routine care was still lacking. This verdict concerns PRIME, not the separately cited EMERALD programme. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Large multicountry initiatives such as PRIME and EMERALD illustrated that task-shifted models can achieve clinical feasibility, provider acceptability, and early service utilization gains when embedded within primary care platforms.

    “Large multicountry initiatives such as PRIME and EMERALD illustrated that task-shifted models can achieve clinical feasibility, provider acceptability, and early service utilization gains when embedded within primary care platforms (Lund et al. 2012, Semrau et al. 2015).”

    From Government-led scale-up of task-shifted mental health services in Lagos State, Nigeria: a mixed-methods descriptive-explanatory case study (2026) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2012

    The Summary Points and Aims and Objectives identify PRIME as a five-country programme integrating mental health care into primary care. But the Aims and Objectives say feasibility, acceptability, and impact *will* be evaluated; the Conclusion: Expected Outcomes likewise describes hoped-for gains. This 2012 paper therefore does not establish achieved clinical feasibility, provider acceptability, or early service-utilization gains for PRIME. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lund et al. used stakeholder workshops to develop their ToC and then used this to refine the substance and delivery of integrated district mental healthcare plans in five low- and middle-income countries.

    “Lund et al. used stakeholder workshops to develop their ToC and then used this to refine the substance and delivery of integrated district mental healthcare plans in five low- and middle-income countries [55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]World Health Organization (2008) Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): scaling up care for mental, neurological and substance abuse disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization. 26290926

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lund, C., Tomlinson, M., De Silva, M., Fekadu, A., Shidhaye, R., Jordans, M., Petersen, I., Bhana, A., Kigozi, F., Prince, M., Thornicroft, G., Hanlon, C., Kakuma, R., McDaid, D., Saxena, S., Chisholm, D., Raja, S., Kippen-Wood, S., Honikman, S., Fairall, L., & Patel, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Lund, Crick
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
e1001359
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2114770054
Cited by
584
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 8
FWCI
36.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10053)
  • King's College London
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
mental illness, treatment gap, mental health services, low- and middle-income countries, mental health policy
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Developing Countries, Ethiopia, Humans, India, Maternal Health Services, Mental Health Services, Nepal, Organizations, Nonprofit, Primary Health Care, South Africa, Uganda, Program Development, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Healthcare Disparities, Public-Private Sector Partnerships, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review