Cited by 20Coffee research and impactsCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Acute effect of coffee on aortic stiffness and wave reflections in healthy individuals: differential effect according to habitual consumption

Ioakeimidis, Nikolaos, Tzifos, Vaios, Vlachopoulos, Charalambos, Terentes-Printzios, Dimitrios, Georgakopoulos, Christos, Tousoulis, Dimitrios·2018·International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition

Abstract

The acute effect of coffee on arterial stiffness and its dependence on habitual consumption was studied in 24 volunteers on four separate occasions during which subjects received: (a) coffee espresso, (b) decaffeinated coffee espresso, (c) caffeine alone and (d) placebo (hot water). The increase in carotid femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx) and augmented pressure (AP) of the aortic pressure waveform after coffee consumption was more pronounced in non-habitual (n = 13) compared to habitual drinkers (n = 11), (differences of maximal changes between groups in PWV, AIx, AP responses by 0.39 m/s, 4.5% and 1.9 mmHg, respectively, for coffee; and by 0.34 m/s, 5.3% and 2.1 mmHg, respectively, for decaffeinated coffee; all p < .05). Caffeine increased PWV, as well as AIx and AP but differences in responses between the two groups were not significant. Both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption is associated with a more potent effect on arterial stiffness in non-habitual than habitual coffee consumers, whereas caffeine induces comparable changes in both groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09637486.2017.1422700

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ioakeimidis, N., Tzifos, V., Vlachopoulos, C., Terentes-Printzios, D., Georgakopoulos, C., & Tousoulis, D.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Henry Dunant Hospital (GR)
Corresponding author
Vlachopoulos, Charalambos
Venue
International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
Published
2018-01-10
Volume
69
Issue
7
Pages
870-881
ISSN
  • 0963-7486 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3478
OpenAlex
W2784159980
Cited by
19
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
coffee, aortic stiffness, arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity, wave reflection, augmentation index, caffeine, decaffeinated coffee, espresso, aortic pressure waveform
MeSH terms
Adult, Aorta, Caffeine, Coffee, Female, Humans, Male, Single-Blind Method, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult, Vascular Stiffness, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review