The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a theory of behavioral control
Abstract
A careful consideration of studies on behavioral prediction in the existing literature suggests that behavioral control is often included as one of the many key factors involved in the theorization of consumer behavior. However, little effort has been dedicated to enrich and progress our understanding of behavioral control beyond empirical testing and replication. To address this gap, this article reviews the theorization, conceptualization, and operationalization of behavioral control, and proposes the theory of behavioral control to close the extant gaps in understanding and to chart the way forward for approaching behavioral control. More specifically, the theory of behavioral control developed herein explains the distinctions and characteristics of behavioral control, which could manifest in two ways in the form of covert and overt controls. The implications of the theory are also discussed, with a focus on dealing with the methods to develop and strengthen desired behavioral control as well as to overcome and weaken undesired behavioral control. As a whole, the propositions on behavioral control presented herein should solidify the foundational understanding of behavioral control for future consumer research involving behavioral controls, such as ethical behavior, technology adoption, and sustainable consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1
Ajzen, I. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x · Cited by 7,629
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1×
“Predicated on the expectancy–value model, the attitude toward the behavior is determined by behavioral beliefs that link the behavior of interest to the expected outcomes, such that the strength of each behavioral belief is weighted by the evaluation of the expected outcome (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977).”
MethodPrediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688
Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x · Cited by 3,344
Cited by
Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12695 · Cited by 2,364
Self-citationPersonalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward
Chandra, S., Verma, S., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21670 · Cited by 595
Self-citationAlexa, what do we know about conversational commerce? Insights from a systematic literature review.
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21654 · Cited by 293
Self-citationCharacteristics and roles of streamers in e-commerce live streaming
Zhang, S., Huang, C., Li, X., & Ren, A. (2022) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2022.2068530 · Cited by 130
Giving electronic word of mouth (eWOM) as a prepurchase behavior: The case of online group buying
Lim, W. M., Ahmed, P. K., & Ali, M. Y. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.093 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, W. M., & Weissmann, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Strategic Marketing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 185-211
- ISSN
- 0965-254X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4488
- OpenAlex
- W3134381097
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 22.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a theory of behavioral control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0965254x.2021.1890190
- The paper
- Lim, W. M., & Weissmann, M. A. (2023). Toward a theory of behavioral control. Journal of Strategic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254x.2021.1890190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.