Cited by 44Memory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Time-course of eye movement-related decrease in vividness and emotionality of unpleasant autobiographical memories

Smeets, Monique A. M., Dijs, M. Willem, Pervan, Iva, Engelhard, Iris M., van den Hout, Marcel A.·2012·Memory

Abstract

The time-course of changes in vividness and emotionality of unpleasant autobiographical memories associated with making eye movements (eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, EMDR) was investigated. Participants retrieved unpleasant autobiographical memories and rated their vividness and emotionality prior to and following 96 seconds of making eye movements (EM) or keeping eyes stationary (ES); at 2, 4, 6, and 10 seconds into the intervention; then followed by regular larger intervals throughout the 96-second intervention. Results revealed a significant drop compared to the ES group in emotionality after 74 seconds compared to a significant drop in vividness at only 2 seconds into the intervention. These results support that emotionality becomes reduced only after vividness has dropped. The results are discussed in light of working memory theory and visual imagery theory, following which the regular refreshment of the visual memory needed to maintain it in working memory is interfered with by eye movements that also tax working memory, which affects vividness first.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2012.665462

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders in MS well exceeds the anxiety disorder lifetime prevalence in healthy individuals of 13%.

    “and well exceeds the anxiety disorder lifetime prevalence in healthy individuals of 13%.2”

    From EMDR treatment for anxiety in MS patients: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from high levels of anxiety.

    “Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients suffer from high levels of anxiety.”

    From EMDR treatment for anxiety in MS patients: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [2]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smeets, M. A. M., Dijs, M. W., Pervan, I., Engelhard, I. M., & van den Hout, M. A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Smeets, Monique A. M.
Venue
Memory
Published
2012-05
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
346-357
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2130568266
Cited by
44
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
EMDR, memory vividness, memory emotionality, eye movements, working memory, visual imagery, memory retrieval
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Desensitization, Psychologic, Emotions, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Reaction Time, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review