Cited by 47Memory Processes and InfluencesSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Retrieval-induced forgetting, delay, and sleep

Abel, Magdalena, Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T.·2012·Memory

Abstract

Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) refers to the finding that retrieval of a subset of previously studied material can cause forgetting of related unpractised material. Prior work on the role of delay between practice and test for RIF reported mixed results. Whereas some studies found RIF to be a relatively transient phenomenon, others found RIF to persist over time. We examined whether the persistence of RIF can depend on whether wakefulness or sleep follows retrieval practice. We employed a variant of the retrieval-practice paradigm with short (20 minutes) and long (12 hours) delay conditions. In all conditions participants studied a perceptually categorised list followed by retrieval practice on some of the items from some of the categories. Participants studied and practised the material in the morning or the evening. RIF was present in the short-delay conditions, and it was present in the long-delay condition if the delay included nocturnal sleep; if the long delay was filled with diurnal wakefulness, RIF was absent. Results show that whether delay eliminates RIF or not can depend on whether sleep or wake follows retrieval practice. Connections of the results to recent findings about the role of delay and sleep for RIF are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2012.671832

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep after learning preferentially strengthened memory for word stimuli weakened by interference learning or retrieval-induced forgetting or for very difficult motor movements.

    “Contrasting this view, sleep after learning preferentially strengthened memory for word stimuli weakened by interference learning (325, 343) or retrievalinduced forgetting (1) or for very difficult motor movements (679).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abel, M., & Bäuml, K.-H. T.
Affiliations
University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T.
Venue
Memory
Published
2012-05-28
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
420-428
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2037560781
Cited by
47
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
retrieval-induced forgetting, sleep, wakefulness, retrieval practice
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Sleep, Time Factors, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review