Cited by 277Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model

Kornell, Nate, Bjork, Robert A., Garcia, Michael A.·2011·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the short term (within an hour of learning), restudied information is better remembered than information subjected to retrieval practice.

    “In the short term (e.g. within an hour of learning), restudied information is better remembered than information subjected to retrieval practice [1–3].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Corrective feedback can reduce difficulty and prevent disengagement.

    “In such cases, corrective feedback can reduce difficulty and prevent disengagement (Binks, 2018; Kornell et al., 2011).”
  • For participants who restudy items, the distribution of memory strengths shifts to the right.

    “For participants who then restudy the items, the resulting memory strengths will tend to increase such that the distribution of memory strengths will be shifted to the right (Figure 7c).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Kornell et al. 2011

  • As time passes before the final criterial test, all items have reduced memory strength due to forgetting; the greater the passage of time, the more shift in the distribution due to forgetting.

    “As time passes before the final criterial test, all items will have reduced memory strength due to forgetting; the greater the passage of time, the more shift in the distribution due to forgetting.”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Kornell et al. 2011

  • In the bifurcation model, after a person studies a set of items, there will be variability in the resulting memory strength of those items.

    “After a person studies a set of items, there will be variability in the resulting memory strength of those items (see Figure 7a,b).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Kornell et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Williams College (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kornell, Nate
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
85-97
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146545999
Cited by
277
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
retrieval-induced forgetting, bifurcation model, memory strength, restudying, retrieval practice, forgetting rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review