Cited by 47Nostalgia and Consumer BehaviorIdentity, Memory, and TherapyMemory Processes and Influences

Autobiographical memory functions of nostalgia in comparison to rumination and counterfactual thinking: similarity and uniqueness

Cheung, Wing-Yee, Wildschut, Tim, Sedikides, Constantine·2018·Memory

Abstract

We compared and contrasted nostalgia with rumination and counterfactual thinking in terms of their autobiographical memory functions. Specifically, we assessed individual differences in nostalgia, rumination, and counterfactual thinking, which we then linked to self-reported functions or uses of autobiographical memory (Self-Regard, Boredom Reduction, Death Preparation, Intimacy Maintenance, Conversation, Teach/Inform, and Bitterness Revival). We tested which memory functions are shared and which are uniquely linked to nostalgia. The commonality among nostalgia, rumination, and counterfactual thinking resides in their shared positive associations with all memory functions: individuals who evinced a stronger propensity towards past-oriented thought (as manifested in nostalgia, rumination, and counterfactual thinking) reported greater overall recruitment of memories in the service of present functioning. The uniqueness of nostalgia resides in its comparatively strong positive associations with Intimacy Maintenance, Teach/Inform, and Self-Regard and weak association with Bitterness Revival. In all, nostalgia possesses a more positive functional signature than do rumination and counterfactual thinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2017.1346129

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trait nostalgia is positively associated with intimacy maintenance.

    “For instance, trait nostalgia is positively associated with intimacy maintenance29.”
  • Individuals high in trait nostalgia are more likely to use autobiographical memories to maintain intimacy.

    “Supporting this idea, individuals high in trait nostalgia are more likely to use autobiographical memories to maintain intimacy [25].”

    From Nostalgia: An impactful social emotion (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheung, W.-Y., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Wildschut, Tim
Venue
Memory
Published
2017-07
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
229-237
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2728922461
Cited by
47
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Winchester Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
nostalgia, rumination, counterfactual reasoning, autobiographical memory, memory function, individual differences, self-regard, preparation for death, boredom reduction
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Thinking, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review