Cited by 422Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionNostalgia and Consumer BehaviorDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

A blast from the past: The terror management function of nostalgia

Open access
Routledge, Clay, Arndt, Jamie, Sedikides, Constantine, Wildschut, Tim·2008·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.11.001

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the mortality-salience condition, nostalgia decreased death-thought accessibility.

    “Again, in the mortalitysalience condition, nostalgia decreased death-thought accessibility.”

    From To Nostalgize (2015) · cites this paper as Routledge et al., 2008, Experiment 3

  • In the mortality salience (but not control) condition, more nostalgic participants reported higher meaning.

    “In the case of mortality salience (but not control), more nostalgic participants reported higher meaning.”

    From To Nostalgize (2015) · cites this paper as Routledge et al., 2008, Experiment 1

  • In the mortality-salience (but not control) condition, higher levels of nostalgia were associated with lower death-thought accessibility.

    “In the mortality-salience (but not control) condition, higher levels of nostalgia were associated with lower death-thought accessibility.”

    From To Nostalgize (2015) · cites this paper as Routledge et al., 2008, Experiment 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]4. Greenberg, S. L., Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 35-53). New York: Guilford Press.
  2. [8]8. Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning (2nd ed.) New York: Free Press.
  3. [34]34. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Routledge, C., Arndt, J., Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Routledge, Clay
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
132-140
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034929128
Cited by
422
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
nostalgia, terror management theory, mortality salience, death thoughts, meaning in life, existential coping, fear of death, nostalgia proneness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review