CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

How word comprehension exposures facilitate later spoken production: implications for lexical processing and repetition priming

Tsuboi, Naoko, Francis, Wendy S., Jameson, Jason T.·2021·Memory
DOI 10.1080/09658211.2020.1845740
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Both comprehension and production exposures to words facilitate spoken production of the same words in picture-naming tasks performed several minutes later. Three experiments examined the mechanisms by which different types of comprehension exposures to words facilitate spoken production. Both overt and silent reading and listening tasks elicited substantial priming in picture naming at 10-minute but not 1-week retention intervals. Relative to silent conditions, encoding conditions that involved speaking the target word overtly elicited stronger priming effects in both RT and accuracy and larger frequency effects in RT. Frequency effects were not reliable in accuracy priming or silent-encoding RT priming. Articulatory suppression did not diminish priming effects relative to silent reading/listening, and priming effects did not depend on whether presentations at encoding were visual or auditory. Together, the results indicate that a common modality-general lemma representation is accessed in comprehension and production, that both lemma and phonological retrieval contribute to repetition priming in production, and that phonological retrieval is sensitive to word frequency. These results are consistent with a theory based on transfer-appropriate processing if word comprehension elicits top-down processing or feedback from the concept to the lemma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2020.1845740

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Speech planning can be primed.

    “There is no doubt that speech planning can be primed.”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Tsuboi et al., 2021

  • Lexical repetition priming: words are retrieved faster and/or more accurately when they have been recently heard or produced than when this is not the case.

    “there is strong evidence from many laboratory studies demonstrating lexical repetition priming, with words being retrieved faster and/or more accurately when they have been recently heard or produced than when this is not the case”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Tsuboi et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Tsuboi, N., Francis, W. S., & Jameson, J. T.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Corresponding author
Francis, Wendy S.
ORCID
Francis, Wendy S.
Venue
Memory
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-11-17
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
39-58
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
DOI
10.1080/09658211.2020.1845740
OpenAlex
W3103892181
Cited by
12
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-1632283)
  • Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
repetition priming, word comprehension, spoken word production, picture naming, lexical processing, phonological retrieval, word frequency effects, transfer-appropriate processing, articulatory suppression, silent reading, listening, retention interval, top-down processing
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Humans, Semantics, Comprehension, Repetition Priming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review