Cited by 609Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Lexical Selection in Bilinguals: Do Words in the Bilingual's Two Lexicons Compete for Selection?

Costa, Albert, Miozzo, Michele, Caramazza, Alfonso·1999·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.1999.2651

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-10
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
365-397
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112346609
Cited by
607
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 32
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
word choice, picture-word interference, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, cross-linguistic interference, phonological facilitation, grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, lexical competition, semantic interference, phonological interference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review