Cited by 237Disability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and SportTheatre and Performance Studies

Skin, Tooth, and Bone – The Basis of Movement is Our People: A Disability Justice Primer

Open access
Invalid, Sins·2017·Reproductive Health Matters

Abstract

Skin, Tooth, and Bone by Sins Invalid (2016) is a snappy, accessible, yet challenging 70-page long booklet by multiple authors, all part of the Sins Invalid performance arts collective, based in Sa...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09688080.2017.1335999

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empowering technology at the community level would enhance visibility and engagement, foster solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence among individuals.

    “Therefore, empowering technology at the community level would enhance visibility and engagement, foster solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence among individuals, in line with the concept of networked empowerment [3] and Disability Justice [12, 39, 62].”

    From Rethinking “Empowering Technology” in Higher Education Accessibility: A Case Study of Disabled Students’ Experiences at a German University (2026) · cites this paper as [39]

    The review (pp. 149–150) discusses Disability Justice, accessible organising, and community members’ needs, supporting the sentence’s broad connection to Disability Justice. Our copy does not establish that solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence are the particular outcomes described. The proposed effect of community-level technology is the citing authors’ own prediction, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Invalid, S.
Affiliations
Myroslava Tataryn, Ottawa, Canada
Corresponding author
Invalid, Sins
Venue
Reproductive Health Matters
Published
2017-06-12
Volume
25
Issue
50
Pages
149-150
ISSN
  • 0968-8080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9576
OpenAlex
W2730740198
Cited by
237
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Health Matters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Theatre and Performance Studies
Keywords
disability justice, performance art, disability activism, reproductive rights, bodily autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review